Teams

OC Fuzzy Lemons - CMTC - Lai-Lai - Sat9

2025 USTA Adult 40 & Over - OC WE · OC Women WE - 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.30 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#3 DoublesLisabeth Grimm / Irene Wang vs Cecilia Mai / Fay Shao3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesLisabeth Grimm vs Julia Bruno McAndrew0-6, 0-6
2025-03-16vs OC LPC Irvine - Debra - Sun9Lost 04
L#1 DoublesAbby Bradecich / Larissa Tan vs Jing Dong / Ellen Yang6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesCHERIE SHARP vs Yuka Nabangxang1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLailai Ho / Annie Fan vs Susie Xie / Jennifer Xu0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLlanyee Liwanpo / Irene Wang vs Sherry Rui Xu / Darlene Anievas0-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesLisabeth Grimm vs Ria Lamenzo0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAnnie Fan / Lisabeth Grimm vs Tricia Bregman / Quynh Nghiem2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAnnie Fan / Lisabeth Grimm vs Noriko Imai / Deborah Eskenazi2-6, 1-6
2025-02-08Won 10
W#1 SinglesLisabeth Grimm vs Amy Tran6-2, 7-6
2025-02-02vs OC YLCC - Sheri - Sun3Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLisabeth Grimm / Larissa Tan vs Sandy Swearingen / Valerie Armijo3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women WE - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Lesley Nishigawara
published
3.30
Laura O'Leary
published
3.26
Abby Bradecich
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Lisabeth Grimm
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.14
Dawn Shapiro
published 3.5
3.05
Lailai Ho
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Llanyee Liwanpo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.84
CHERIE SHARP
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.80
Annie Fan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Larissa Tan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura O'Leary + Lesley Nishigawara123 matchesnot enough data
Laura O'Leary + Abby Bradecich213 matchesnot enough data
Lisabeth Grimm + Lailai Ho303 matchesnot enough data
Lesley Nishigawara + Abby Bradecich123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lesley Nishigawara
30W–21L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.40
Laura O'Leary
14W–10L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Abby Bradecich
12W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Lisabeth Grimm
63W–73L career · 7 lines in 2025
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Dawn Shapiro
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
3.14
Lailai Ho
16W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.05
Llanyee Liwanpo
2W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.05
3
CHERIE SHARP
12W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Annie Fan
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
1%93%6%
2.80
Larissa Tan
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.