Teams

MORGAN HILL TC/MORGAN HILL TC 40AW3.5A-DT

2025 ADULT 40&Over - Daytime · Women's 3.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-03-03vs RINCONADA PK 40AW3.5A-DTWon 10
W#1 DoublesBing Cai / Bonnie Chamchawee vs Dana Weintraub / Paige Zelikow6-2, 6-2
2025-01-16vs RINCONADA PK 40AW3.5A-DTWon 10
W#2 DoublesViola Ng / Bonnie Chamchawee vs Emily Robinson / Paige Zelikow7-6, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Mhavz Malado
published
3.60
Bonnie Chamchawee
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.50
Abbie Serrano
published 3.5
3.38
Pari Pham
published
3.32
Allison Rohnert
published 3.5
3.30
Tina Clark
published
3.29
Sharon Winchester
published
3.27
Kylee Waterman
published
3.19
Kristie Solomon
published
3.13
Aida Cazares
published 3.5
3.11
Jewel A Knofler
published
2.72
Catherine Pham
published 3.5
Ivy Nguyen
published
Nik Pham
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristie Solomon + Tina Clark314 matchesnot enough data
Allison Rohnert + Kristie Solomon213 matchesnot enough data
Kristie Solomon + Aida Cazares123 matchesnot enough data
Tina Clark + Bonnie Chamchawee213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mhavz Malado
39W–19L career · no lines in 2025
<1%22%78%
3.61
3.5
Bonnie Chamchawee
83W–30L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.60
3.5
Abbie Serrano
36W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.50
Pari Pham
8W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Allison Rohnert
44W–41L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Tina Clark
20W–17L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
Sharon Winchester
9W–4L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Kylee Waterman
3W–8L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Kristie Solomon
29W–19L career · no lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.19
3.5
Aida Cazares
8W–16L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.13
Jewel A Knofler
22W–26L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
3.5
Catherine Pham
16W–33L career · no lines in 2025
98%2%<1%
2.72
Ivy Nguyen
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nik Pham
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.