Teams

F 3.0S/6.0D PM Farr

2022 NEOTA Fusion · NEOTA 3.0S

19 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings10 teams · NEOTA 3.0S
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1F 3.0S/6.0D CC Dixon9036921263
2F 3.0S/6.0D NC Booher72321330302
3F 3.0S/6.0D PM Farr72252042329
4F 3.0S/6.0D WE Lodge63252045349
5F 3.0S/6.0D PW Merugu54222349405
6F 3.0S/6.0D MM Mei45232248375
7F 3.0S/6.0D CRC Shand36182758426
8F 3.0S/6.0D TP Farrell27162959402
9F 3.0S/6.0D MV Beebe18182757419
10F 3.0S/6.0D CV Carroll18103574496

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Iuliana Nita
published 3.5
3.27
Dustin Carpenter
published 3.5
Claudia Miles
published 3.5
3.07
2.94
Kristi Scherler
published
2.85
Diane Blesi
published 3
2.84
Bonita Teeuwen
published 3.5
2.81
Ben Gilbert
published 3
2.74
Kim Dean
published
2.72
Bogdan Nicolae
published 3
2.64
Susan Whitlam
published
2.63
William Farr
published
David Gann
published
Jessica George
published
John Richardson
published
Marcy Hughes
published
Ron Sanchez
published
Sandra Rusinko
published
William Miles
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bonita Teeuwen + Christine Schwall17659% games+8.1% vs expected
Susan Whitlam + Jessica George2346% games+4.5% vs expected
Bonita Teeuwen + Kristi Scherler6061% gamesnot enough data
Susan Whitlam + Bonita Teeuwen1441% gamesnot enough data
Iuliana Nita + Susan Whitlam314 matchesnot enough data
Ben Gilbert + William Miles134 matchesnot enough data
Susan Whitlam + Kristi Scherler033 matchesnot enough data
Susan Whitlam + Christine Schwall123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Iuliana Nita
123W–64L career · no lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Dustin Carpenter
78W–69L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Claudia Miles
80W–48L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Christine Schwall
150W–73L career · no lines in 2022
<1%30%70%
3.07
Kristi Scherler
73W–40L career · no lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
2.94
3
Diane Blesi
185W–128L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
2.85
3.5
Bonita Teeuwen
130W–96L career · no lines in 2022
89%11%<1%
2.84
3
Ben Gilbert
20W–21L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%8%
2.81
Kim Dean
88W–96L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
2.74
3
Bogdan Nicolae
39W–31L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.72
Susan Whitlam
49W–119L career · no lines in 2022
>99%<1%<1%
2.64
William Farr
96W–114L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
2.63
David Gann
38W–33L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jessica George
17W–20L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
John Richardson
25W–25L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Marcy Hughes
11W–11L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Ron Sanchez
14W–16L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sandra Rusinko
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
William Miles
9W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.