Teams

MLong-ENO

2025 Eno River Mixed 18 & Over · 18 & Over Mixed 3.5 Evening

14 players · average NTRP 3.45 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-29vs LStanek-HRWon 30
W#1 DoublesCorinne Haywood / Vidit Desai vs Neil McElroy / Jennifer Gillie6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAmber Jarvis / Shivam Panthri vs John Lockhead / Pilneyo Seo6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesConor Lynch / Celina Morice vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-07-29vs KLaan-ENOWon 21
W#1 DoublesCorinne Haywood / Vidit Desai vs Katie Elder / David Schumann7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesBreah Woolson / Shivam Panthri vs Karli Eller / Michael Ratliff4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRajeev Bhogadi / Amy Hobbs vs Wendy Lindberg / Stephen Fu6-2, 6-4
2025-07-22vs LHsu-HRSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCorinne Haywood / Vidit Desai vs Andrew Nelsen / Sara Lawrence6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesRajeev Bhogadi / Christy Avery vs Michael Andre / Rebecca Walsh5-7, 6-1, 0-1
2025-07-08vs LHsu-HRWon 20
W#1 DoublesVidit Desai / Corinne Haywood vs Michael Andre / Sara Lawrence6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLauren Redmond / Shivam Panthri vs Andrew Nelsen / Rebecca Walsh6-3, 6-3
2025-07-01vs KGreen-ENOWon 10
W#1 DoublesCorinne Haywood / Vidit Desai vs Kristin Cooley / Tanner Dellinger2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-06-24vs SGraff-ENOWon 20
W#1 DoublesCorinne Haywood / Vidit Desai vs Kyra Webb / Max Lipshitz6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBreah Woolson / Shivam Panthri vs Collette Toney / John Lin6-2, 6-0
2025-06-17vs ABaxley-ENOLost 03
L#1 DoublesCelina Morice / Vidit Desai vs Ivan Andjelkovic / Ashley McRae4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesLauren Redmond / Rajeev Bhogadi vs Jonathan Ryan / Andrea Desonglo4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMary T Long / Shivam Panthri vs Angela Baxley / Richard Griffin6-7, 3-6
2025-06-11vs ROakley-EVWon 20
W#2 DoublesAmy Hobbs / Shivam Panthri vs Aaron Young / Ami Young6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCorinne Haywood / Vidit Desai vs Zach Rowles / Kelly Travis6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Mixed 3.5 Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Vidit Desai
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published 4
3.52
Amy Hobbs
published 3.5
3.50
Corinne Haywood
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.45
Amber Jarvis
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.42
Shivam Panthri
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.39
Celina Morice
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.34
Rajeev Bhogadi
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Breah Woolson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Lauren Redmond
published
Christy Avery
published 3.5
3.04
Conor Lynch
published 3
3.02
Aine Lynch
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.86
Matthew Davies
published
2.78
Mary T Long
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Corinne Haywood + Vidit Desai10165% games+14.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Vidit Desai
60W–32L career · 8 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
3.5
Amy Hobbs
52W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.52
3.5
Corinne Haywood
120W–65L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
3.50
3.5
Amber Jarvis
90W–54L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.45
3.5
Shivam Panthri
87W–44L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.42
3.5
Celina Morice
92W–77L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%77%22%
3.39
3.5
Rajeev Bhogadi
70W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Breah Woolson
73W–40L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Lauren Redmond
22W–11L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%5%
3.28
3.5
Christy Avery
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Conor Lynch
10W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.04
3
Aine Lynch
21W–26L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.02
Matthew Davies
12W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%16%
2.86
Mary T Long
27W–68L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.