Teams

KY/LEX/ROSS

2024 USTA LEAGUE 40 & Over ADULT LEXINGTON · Men 4.0

19 players · average NTRP 3.64 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-03-11vs KY/LEX/Wilson/LexingtonLost 01
L#3 DoublesGheorghe Ignat / David Ferretti vs Stephen Humphress / Mike Wilson5-7, 6-1, 0-1
2024-03-08vs KY/Lex/GrahamLost 01
L#4 DoublesGheorghe Ignat / Richard Lane vs John Hansel / Patrick Hancock3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-02-21vs KY/LEX/McCubbin-RebootedLost 01
L#1 DoublesBradley Lewis / Gheorghe Ignat vs Ched Crouse / Chris Cassagne2-6, 5-7
2024-02-06vs KY/LEX/SPARKSLost 02
L#2 DoublesCasey Hutchens / Richard Lane vs John McNamara / Mark Telfer2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesDavid Ferretti / Gheorghe Ignat vs Brian Lauder / Jonathan Profitt1-6, 1-6
2024-01-26vs KY/Lex/GrahamWon 10
W#4 DoublesRichard Lane / Gheorghe Ignat vs Jeff VanderHorst / John Byard6-2, 6-4
2024-01-17vs KY/LEX/McCubbin-RebootedSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMatthew Riddell / Bradley Lewis vs Jonathan Gough / Alan Brown6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKen Ford / Gheorghe Ignat vs Ched Crouse / Allen Dixon7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2024-01-10vs KY/LEX/CASTLELost 02
L#2 DoublesGheorghe Ignat / Nathan Bay vs Tim Jamison / Anthony de Movellan2-6, 3-6
L#4 DoublesVance Michael / Richard Lane vs Mike Howard / Brandon Wilford2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Zach Young
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #4 Doubles 18% · published
Eric Landrum
published 4
3.62
Joey Mckinney
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.58
David Ferretti
usually #1 Singles 64%, also #2 Doubles 18% · published 3.5
3.55
Matthew Riddell
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
3.52
Bradley Lewis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.48
Gheorghe Ignat
usually #3 Doubles 36%, also #4 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
3.46
Joe Ross
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published
3.41
Gerald Slone
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
Justin Ross
usually #4 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.29
Casey Hutchens
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
Vance Michael
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
David Gillispie
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Jeffrey Nesler
published
Jerry Mayer
published
Ken Ford
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
Nathan Bay
usually #1 Singles 63%, also #1 Doubles 13% · published
Richard Lane
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published
Todd Gorrell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gerald Slone + David Ferretti4165% games+8.9% vs expected
Zach Young + Joey Mckinney11856% games+7.7% vs expected
Matthew Riddell + Ken Ford3254% games+6.7% vs expected
Joe Ross + Zach Young6265% games+5.0% vs expected
Casey Hutchens + Gerald Slone1444% gamesnot enough data
Matthew Riddell + Gerald Slone2350% gamesnot enough data
Casey Hutchens + Vance Michael314 matchesnot enough data
Vance Michael + Joe Ross224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Zach Young
85W–44L career · 10 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Eric Landrum
5W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Joey Mckinney
50W–28L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%18%82%
3.62
3.5
David Ferretti
125W–33L career · 11 lines in 2024
<1%26%74%
3.58
Matthew Riddell
44W–62L career · 9 lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
3.55
4
Bradley Lewis
14W–42L career · 2 lines in 2024
44%56%<1%
3.52
3.5
Gheorghe Ignat
212W–125L career · type A · 11 lines in 2024
<1%56%44%
3.48
Joe Ross
88W–42L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Gerald Slone
41W–23L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.41
Justin Ross
31W–23L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Casey Hutchens
56W–47L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.29
Vance Michael
19W–17L career · 8 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
David Gillispie
4W–1L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jeffrey Nesler
6W–11L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jerry Mayer
4W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Ken Ford
9W–6L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Nathan Bay
10W–10L career · 8 lines in 2024
not enough data
Richard Lane
11W–41L career · 8 lines in 2024
not enough data
Todd Gorrell
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.