Teams

MC GOLD

2024 USTA MIXED 18 & OVER - DEN · MIXED 6.0 - 18 & OVER

5 players · average NTRP 2.88 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-19vs RHCC BLUELost 02
L#1 DoublesBetty Evans / Tom Seeton vs Mindi Pearse / Jim Pearse6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKirsten Sharer / Dean Ogawa vs Corey Crawford / Kimberly Salazar Suman1-6, 3-6
2024-05-12vs MC NAVYLost 03
L#1 DoublesBetty Evans / John Williams vs John Hartney / Tanya Hartney2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTom Seeton / Kristine O'Brien vs David Atkinson / Lisa Kellogg1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLora Abeyta / Dean Ogawa vs Stephen Schulte / Kimberly Hitchcock0-6, 3-6
2024-05-05vs MVCC ORANGEWon 21
L#1 DoublesKirsten Sharer / Dean Ogawa vs Samantha Spiwak / William Howard1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKristine O'Brien / Tom Seeton vs Tara McEnroe / Rob Brine6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBetty Evans / John Williams vs Brock Reimer / Jane Reimer6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2024-04-28vs NJ GOLDLost 02
L#1 DoublesBetty Evans / John Williams vs Susan Tomlinson / Kevin Furlong4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKirsten Sharer / Dean Ogawa vs Laura Garrido / Timothy Pistol3-6, 5-7
2024-04-21vs NJ GREENLost 01
L#1 DoublesDean Ogawa / Kirsten Sharer vs Olivier Libouban / Patti Warner0-6, 1-6
2024-04-14vs RHCC BLUELost 02
L#1 DoublesKristine O'Brien / Tom Seeton vs Lana Mendonca / Jim Pearse5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBetty Evans / John Williams vs Carol Tye Rose / Paul Rose3-6, 1-6
2024-04-07vs MC NAVYLost 02
L#1 DoublesKristine O'Brien / Tom Seeton vs Amanda Fuller Wellman / Todd Wellman5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesL Todd Abeyta / Kirsten Sharer vs David Atkinson / Lisa Kellogg1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 6.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.79
Tom Seeton
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.69
Kirsten Sharer
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.66
Dean Ogawa
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Betty Evans
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
Kristine O'Brien
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kirsten Sharer + Dean Ogawa044 matchesnot enough data
Kirsten Sharer + Tom Seeton123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Tom Seeton
58W–65L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Kirsten Sharer
48W–85L career · 8 lines in 2024
8%90%1%
2.69
3
Dean Ogawa
50W–84L career · 5 lines in 2024
13%86%1%
2.66
2.5
Betty Evans
31W–82L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kristine O'Brien
4W–9L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.