Teams

MVCC ORANGE

2024 USTA MIXED 18 & OVER - DEN · MIXED 6.0 - 18 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 2.83 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-19vs NJ GOLDLost 12
L#1 DoublesTara McEnroe / Rob Brine vs Susan Tomlinson / Kevin Furlong6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSara Schaffer / B Patrick Schaffer vs Christine Loehr / Erik E Lindholm2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNancy Fairchild / Cornelis Jan Stam vs James Smith / Anne Townsel6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2024-05-12vs RHCC BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesSara Schaffer / B Patrick Schaffer vs Cheryl Crawford / Corey Crawford2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesTara McEnroe / Rob Brine vs Carol Tye Rose / Paul Rose6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNancy Fairchild / Cornelis Jan Stam vs Natalia Huemoller / John Huemoller2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-05-11vs NJ GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesSara Schaffer / B Patrick Schaffer vs Kevin Anderson / Mary Shugrue5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSamantha Spiwak / William Howard vs Brett Moore / Kathleen Gerbino0-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTara McEnroe / Rob Brine vs Jill Orsatti / Robert Coates6-2, 6-3
2024-05-05vs MC GOLDLost 12
W#1 DoublesSamantha Spiwak / William Howard vs Kirsten Sharer / Dean Ogawa6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesTara McEnroe / Rob Brine vs Kristine O'Brien / Tom Seeton4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBrock Reimer / Jane Reimer vs Betty Evans / John Williams4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2024-04-21vs MC NAVYLost 03
L#1 DoublesB Patrick Schaffer / Sara Schaffer vs John Hartney / Tanya Hartney2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBrock Reimer / Jane Reimer vs Kurt Zimmerman / Kelly Wilson4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Sones / Laurence Sones vs David Atkinson / Lisa Kellogg0-6, 0-6
2024-04-14vs NJ GOLDLost 03
L#1 DoublesNancy Fairchild / Cornelis Jan Stam vs Kristin Walters / Erik E Lindholm4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJane Reimer / Brock Reimer vs Laura Garrido / Kevin Furlong2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Sones / Laurence Sones vs Jennifer Davis / James Smith0-6, 1-6
2024-04-07vs RHCC BLUELost 02
L#1 DoublesNancy Fairchild / Cornelis Jan Stam vs Carol Tye Rose / Paul Rose1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Sones / Laurence Sones vs Natalia Huemoller / John Huemoller2-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · MIXED 6.0 - 18 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LTA-Q ORANGE5217410118
2CPV GOLD43111023161
3CPCC GREEN1531532204
4RMTC PURPLE1651632221
5BTA-IBM YELLOW1661533228
6MC GOLD1621940250
7MVCC ORANGE0741736224

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Elizabeth Sones
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Tara McEnroe
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.08
Sara Schaffer
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.07
William Howard
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.99
Cornelis Jan Stam
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.84
B Patrick Schaffer
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.79
Laurence Sones
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.61
Rob Brine
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.59
Jane Reimer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.20
Nancy Fairchild
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.15
Samantha Spiwak
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sara Schaffer + B Patrick Schaffer7650% games+8.7% vs expected
Elizabeth Sones + Laurence Sones7553% games+1.4% vs expected
Tara McEnroe + Rob Brine101052% games+0.7% vs expected
Nancy Fairchild + Cornelis Jan Stam2640% games−2.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Elizabeth Sones
85W–19L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
3.48
Tara McEnroe
67W–29L career · 4 lines in 2024
15%84%<1%
3.13
Sara Schaffer
33W–49L career · 4 lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
3.08
William Howard
4W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
3.07
3
Cornelis Jan Stam
14W–12L career · type S · 4 lines in 2024
<1%53%47%
2.99
3
B Patrick Schaffer
19W–34L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
2.84
2.5
Laurence Sones
27W–23L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%1%99%
2.79
Rob Brine
19W–22L career · 4 lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
2.61
Jane Reimer
15W–44L career · 3 lines in 2024
24%75%<1%
2.59
2.5
Nancy Fairchild
44W–80L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%99%1%
2.20
2.5
Samantha Spiwak
45W–54L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.15

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.