Teams

Ivory Ridge-Bullington/Fairbanks

2026 Fall Outdoor League-Weekday · 4.0W

16 players · average NTRP 3.95 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings13 teams · 4.0W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Sports Mall-Adams000000
2Ivory Ridge-Bullington/Fairbanks000000
3Sports Mall-Green/Farr000000
4SunPro-Blackhurst/Mayberry000000
5Eccles-Love000000
6SunPro-Burdge/Hall000000
7Mountain Mavens000000
8Liberty Park-Utgaard000000
9Eagleridge-Mower/Price000000
10SunPro-Fowkes000000
11Wasatch Hills-Swensen/Benton000000
12Sports Mall-No Love Lost000000
13PC MARC Greenhalgh-Brooks000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Lisa Bullington
published
Amy Allen
published 4
3.74
Nicole Holland
published
3.74
Sharlene Enloe
published 4
3.61
Angie Haskins
published 4
3.60
Jodie Monson
published 4
3.60
Rachelle Tempest
published 4
3.58
Emily Jarvie
published 4
3.58
Tessa Gurney
published 4
3.57
Jana Fairbanks
published 4
3.55
Tamsin Danis
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.50
Cara Hassey
published 4
3.43
Tammy Petersen
published
3.41
Heather Jensen
published
3.37
Jamie Price
published
3.35
Emily Kelly
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angie Haskins + Amy Allen7360% games+6.5% vs expected
Jamie Price + Lisa Bullington10459% games+6.5% vs expected
Jana Fairbanks + Lisa Bullington5459% games+6.4% vs expected
Nicole Holland + Emily Jarvie241156% games+4.4% vs expected
Tammy Petersen + Sharlene Enloe5549% games+0.8% vs expected
Emily Kelly + Heather Jensen31045% games+0.7% vs expected
Jana Fairbanks + Tammy Petersen5651% games−1.2% vs expected
Tammy Petersen + Cara Hassey11849% games−1.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa Bullington
115W–44L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Amy Allen
54W–39L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Nicole Holland
54W–34L career · no lines in 2026
4%92%3%
3.74
4
Sharlene Enloe
120W–104L career · no lines in 2026
4%92%3%
3.74
4
Angie Haskins
92W–97L career · no lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.61
4
Jodie Monson
144W–103L career · no lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.60
4
Rachelle Tempest
49W–80L career · no lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.60
4
Emily Jarvie
51W–68L career · no lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
3.58
4
Tessa Gurney
60W–62L career · type A · no lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.58
4
Jana Fairbanks
48W–52L career · no lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.57
3.5
Tamsin Danis
36W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%37%63%
3.55
4
Cara Hassey
47W–45L career · no lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
3.50
Tammy Petersen
40W–55L career · no lines in 2026
69%31%<1%
3.43
Heather Jensen
44W–103L career · no lines in 2026
74%26%<1%
3.41
Jamie Price
45W–55L career · no lines in 2026
82%18%<1%
3.37
Emily Kelly
22W–24L career · 1 line in 2026
1%85%14%
3.35

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.