Teams

Desai-CC

2023 CORTA Southern Combo 18 & Over - Summer · Men 7.5

21 players · average NTRP 3.67 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Men 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Matthew Boles
published
3.92
John Paul Divers
published
3.85
Maurice Allen
published
3.83
Nathan Gehman
published
3.82
Nishant de Quadros
published
3.73
Glenn Griffin
published 4
3.68
Ryan Gordon
published
3.67
Clifford Simmons
published 4
3.58
Neil Desai
published
3.47
Paul Fahnestock
published
3.40
Alap Shah
published 3.5
3.33
Simon Brooks
published
3.31
John Pezold
published
3.30
Bruce McKenzie
published 3.5
3.29
Min Chul So
published
3.26
L Scott Laymon
published
3.25
Rich Pak
published
3.25
Al Dean
published 3.5
Charles Boland
published 3.5
3.23
Vikram Chhokar
published
3.23
Ketan Dalsania
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maurice Allen + John Paul Divers4258% games+0.1% vs expected
Nishant de Quadros + John Paul Divers4450% games−3.8% vs expected
Paul Fahnestock + Simon Brooks4356% games−9.6% vs expected
L Scott Laymon + Alap Shah224 matchesnot enough data
Ketan Dalsania + Bruce McKenzie404 matchesnot enough data
Nathan Gehman + John Paul Divers314 matchesnot enough data
Nathan Gehman + Matthew Boles224 matchesnot enough data
L Scott Laymon + Simon Brooks033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Matthew Boles
31W–17L career · no lines in 2023
<1%58%42%
3.97
John Paul Divers
91W–34L career · no lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
3.92
Maurice Allen
45W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%86%13%
3.85
Nathan Gehman
30W–18L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%10%
3.83
Nishant de Quadros
50W–41L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Glenn Griffin
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
Ryan Gordon
14W–17L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Clifford Simmons
42W–24L career · no lines in 2023
10%90%1%
3.67
Neil Desai
82W–41L career · no lines in 2023
<1%27%73%
3.58
Paul Fahnestock
36W–19L career · no lines in 2023
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Alap Shah
42W–42L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.40
Simon Brooks
19W–20L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.33
John Pezold
5W–5L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.31
3.5
Bruce McKenzie
42W–34L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.30
Min Chul So
11W–24L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%5%
3.29
L Scott Laymon
28W–40L career · no lines in 2023
2%95%3%
3.26
Rich Pak
28W–20L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Al Dean
26W–20L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Charles Boland
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Vikram Chhokar
6W–6L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
Ketan Dalsania
29W–14L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.