Teams

LS:Wright/Katz

2021 ECT Adult 55 & Over Women · 7.0 Women 1

10 players · average NTRP 3.29 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2020-11-14vs OSB:Overserved:Potter/CostelloLost 03
L#1 DoublesDenise Marvel / Barbara Schneider vs Andrea Ely / Svetlana Goletz2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAnn Wright / Susan Dellenbaugh vs Mary Ann Moran / Amy Searle6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDiane Comforti / Cathleen Carroll vs Rebecca Coffey / Paula Passarello4-6, 0-6
2020-10-25vs LS:Set 2 Win:BurlinghamSplit 11
L#1 DoublesGrace Degrooth / Ann Wright vs Debra Chamberlain / Connie Hurtt3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesShari Peters / Eleanor Shields vs Camille Burlingham / Annette David-Rallo3-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 7.0 Women 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LS:Wright/Katz000000
2OSB:Overserved:Potter/Costello0510513129
3LS:Set 2 Win:Burlingham0551022151

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Carolyn Katz
published 3.5
3.44
Cathleen Carroll
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
MaryBeth Giles
published
3.30
Grace Degrooth
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Carol Strafaci
published 3.5
2.80
Denise Marvel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Eleanor Shields
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Barbara Schneider
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Marian Bairstow
published
Susan Dellenbaugh
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carolyn Katz + Grace Degrooth21961% games+6.3% vs expected
MaryBeth Giles + Carolyn Katz20760% games+2.8% vs expected
Barbara Schneider + Cathleen Carroll2343% games+0.2% vs expected
Susan Dellenbaugh + Carol Strafaci123 matchesnot enough data
Barbara Schneider + Grace Degrooth213 matchesnot enough data
MaryBeth Giles + Grace Degrooth213 matchesnot enough data
Cathleen Carroll + Grace Degrooth123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carolyn Katz
87W–37L career · no lines in 2021
<1%52%48%
3.49
3.5
Cathleen Carroll
132W–93L career · 1 line in 2021
<1%67%33%
3.44
MaryBeth Giles
75W–40L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Grace Degrooth
67W–46L career · 1 line in 2021
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Carol Strafaci
56W–63L career · no lines in 2021
8%91%1%
3.18
3
Denise Marvel
3W–35L career · 1 line in 2021
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Eleanor Shields
24W–31L career · 1 line in 2021
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Barbara Schneider
19W–26L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Marian Bairstow
4W–15L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Susan Dellenbaugh
38W–56L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.