Teams

HOLBROOK PK 55AW9.0A

2025 ADULT 55&Over · Women 9.0

16 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-05-24vs CUBBERLEY 55AW9.0ALost 02
L#1 DoublesSusan Lynch / Ann Jaquith vs Christina Ching / Cynthia Abel2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMia Banks / Jane Solomon vs Elena Caruso / Jane Liddle3-6, 4-6
2025-05-04vs CUBBERLEY 55AW9.0AWon 21
W#1 DoublesEllie Victor / Michele Lindzy vs Catherine Vowles / Cynthia Abel7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesTanya Gacs / Tracy Hogan vs Amy Browne / Peggy Schatzman4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSusan Lynch / Jane Solomon vs Marilyn Morrell-Kristal / Christina Ching3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-04-13vs CUBBERLEY 55AW9.0AWon 21
W#1 DoublesIrene Otten / Pratima Rao vs Sophie Heerinckx / Denise Alberto7-5, 7-5
L#2 DoublesKaren Giordano / Shelly Bartlett Sweeney vs Catherine Vowles / Lynn Stanghellini7-5, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAndrea Barnes / Leslie Airola-Murveit vs Sally Cella / Karla Barnette6-4, 6-0
2025-04-12vs CUBBERLEY 55AW9.0ALost 12
L#1 DoublesLiza Geary / Jane Solomon vs Lynn Stanghellini / Sophie Heerinckx4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesMia Banks / Elizabeth Tripaldi vs Sally Cella / Cynthia Abel6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesNancy Serrurier / Ellie Victor vs Karla Barnette / Jennifer Desler2-6, 1-6
2025-03-23vs CUBBERLEY 55AW9.0AWon 30
W#1 DoublesShelly Bartlett Sweeney / Karen Giordano vs Cynthia Abel / Jennifer Desler7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKristine Avila / Ann Jaquith vs Catherine Vowles / Sophie Heerinckx6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesIrene Otten / Pratima Rao vs Jane Liddle / Peggy Schatzman6-4, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.22 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.43
Janise Taylor
published
4.40
Leslie Airola-Murveit
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.39
Shelly Bartlett Sweeney
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.26
Irene Otten
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.25
Ellie Victor
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.23
Mia Banks
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.23
Andrea Barnes
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.20
Pratima Rao
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.19
Kristine Avila
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.15
Michele Lindzy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.14
Liza Geary
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.08
Ann Jaquith
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.95
Tanya Gacs
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Elizabeth Tripaldi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jane Solomon
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Nancy Serrurier
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrea Barnes + Leslie Airola-Murveit7076% gamesnot enough data
Leslie Airola-Murveit + Janise Taylor404 matchesnot enough data
Pratima Rao + Irene Otten213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Janise Taylor
8W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
4.43
Leslie Airola-Murveit
13W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%77%23%
4.40
Shelly Bartlett Sweeney
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
4.39
Irene Otten
11W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%4%
4.26
Ellie Victor
5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
4.25
Mia Banks
9W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
4.23
4.5
Andrea Barnes
12W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
4.23
Pratima Rao
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.20
Kristine Avila
10W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
4.19
Michele Lindzy
34W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%15%85%
4.15
Liza Geary
7W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
16%84%1%
4.14
4.5
Ann Jaquith
10W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
4.08
Tanya Gacs
6W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
63%37%<1%
3.95
Elizabeth Tripaldi
2W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jane Solomon
1W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nancy Serrurier
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.