Teams

High Point/Cooper M8.0

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 55 & Over ADULT · M8.0 Sunday

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-03-23vs McKinney/Megert-Thoma M8.0Won 21
L#1 DoublesJim Zimmermann / Bryan Rader vs David Megert / Mark Jett1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJeff Cooper / Prasad Govindarajan vs Douglas Wallace / John Doe6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKurinji Sathasivam / Adam Krolnik vs Gary Paparella / Derrick Green7-5, 6-2
2025-02-16vs Oak Creek/Rajani-Deleonardis M8.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesMatthew Pope / Jeff Cooper vs Jae Shim / Atul Rajani2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Lantrip / Glenn Jenkins vs Kamran Mir / Wei-Bin Lai3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAdam Krolnik / Stephen Cawthon vs Sarosh Nayar / Ryan Livengood4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for M8.0 Sunday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Kurinji Sathasivam
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Prasad Govindarajan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Stephen Cawthon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Adam Krolnik
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
John Lantrip
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Bryan Rader
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Glenn Jenkins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jim Zimmermann
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Larry Hill
published
Matthew Pope
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Udhay Pentakota
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kurinji Sathasivam + Prasad Govindarajan2443% gamesnot enough data
Kurinji Sathasivam + Adam Krolnik2345% gamesnot enough data
Prasad Govindarajan + Adam Krolnik033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kurinji Sathasivam
9W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.55
Prasad Govindarajan
5W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
46%54%<1%
3.52
Stephen Cawthon
2W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
69%31%<1%
3.43
3.5
Adam Krolnik
3W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
John Lantrip
4W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
14%86%1%
3.15
3.5
Bryan Rader
11W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
15%84%1%
3.14
Glenn Jenkins
2W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
16%84%1%
3.14
Jim Zimmermann
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Larry Hill
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Matthew Pope
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Udhay Pentakota
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.