Teams

GEPTA/Tri-level/4.0-3.0W/Caire#2

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 TRI-LEVEL LEAGUE

12 players · average NTRP 3.62 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Flight standings7 teams · 2026 TRI-LEVEL LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/Tri-level/4.0-3.0W/woo#7000000
2GEPTA/Tri-level/4.0-3.0W/Molina#6000000
3GEPTA/Tri-level/4.0-3.0W/Baeza#1000000
4GEPTA/Tri-level/4.0-3.0W/Caire#2000000
5GEPTA/Tri-level/4.0-3.0W/Cartwright#3000000
6GEPTA/Tri-level/4.0-3.0W/Martinez#5000000
7GEPTA/Tri-level/4.0-3.0W/Colbert#4000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Delaney Kuehnel
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.67
Beth Hoy
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 19% · published 4
3.21
Camila Abbud
usually #2 Doubles 35%, also #2 Singles 30% · published 3.5
2.94
Ariana Dominguez
usually #1 Singles 35%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
Gloria King
usually #2 Doubles 34%, also #3 Doubles 28% · published
Jocelyn Hernandez
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Liliana Cano
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Paola Tirado
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Sandra Castaneda
usually #1 Doubles 52%, also #2 Doubles 37% · published
Tara Mosely
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Tatiana Fernandez
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 23% · published
Yuri Caire
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #3 Doubles 24% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Camila Abbud + Jocelyn Hernandez6257% gamesnot enough data
Camila Abbud + Yuri Caire7157% gamesnot enough data
Tatiana Fernandez + Sandra Castaneda314 matchesnot enough data
Ariana Dominguez + Yuri Caire314 matchesnot enough data
Gloria King + Yuri Caire213 matchesnot enough data
Yuri Caire + Beth Hoy213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Delaney Kuehnel
33W–14L career · 12 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Beth Hoy
42W–12L career · 16 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.67
3.5
Camila Abbud
37W–24L career · 20 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
3
Ariana Dominguez
33W–22L career · 17 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
2.94
Gloria King
100W–61L career · 61 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jocelyn Hernandez
25W–26L career · 24 lines in 2026
not enough data
Liliana Cano
55W–32L career · 9 lines in 2026
not enough data
Paola Tirado
9W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sandra Castaneda
59W–46L career · 27 lines in 2026
not enough data
Tara Mosely
12W–3L career · 14 lines in 2026
not enough data
Tatiana Fernandez
51W–15L career · 34 lines in 2026
not enough data
Yuri Caire
52W–39L career · 32 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.