Teams

GEPTA/Tri-level/4.0-3.0W/Colbert#4

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 TRI-LEVEL LEAGUE

12 players · average NTRP 3.38 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Flight standings7 teams · 2026 TRI-LEVEL LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/Tri-level/4.0-3.0W/woo#7000000
2GEPTA/Tri-level/4.0-3.0W/Molina#6000000
3GEPTA/Tri-level/4.0-3.0W/Baeza#1000000
4GEPTA/Tri-level/4.0-3.0W/Caire#2000000
5GEPTA/Tri-level/4.0-3.0W/Cartwright#3000000
6GEPTA/Tri-level/4.0-3.0W/Martinez#5000000
7GEPTA/Tri-level/4.0-3.0W/Colbert#4000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Allison Glass
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.30
Cortney Shimunov
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 26% · published 3
3.18
Anna Camille Kerr
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.92
Ana Gabilondo
usually #3 Doubles 47%, also #1 Singles 21% · published 3
Hannah Juarez
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 37% · published
Jessica Bordier
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 28% · published
Julia Vera
usually #1 Singles 47%, also #3 Doubles 26% · published
Kate Colbert
usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published
Mariel Berdeja
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #2 Singles 29% · published
Sara Kaltwasser
usually #2 Doubles 35%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Tiffany McKee
usually #2 Doubles 53%, also #1 Doubles 41% · published
Valeria Chavez
usually #1 Singles 77%, also #1 Doubles 18% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jessica Bordier + Cortney Shimunov9075% gamesnot enough data
Hannah Juarez + Allison Glass6158% gamesnot enough data
Ana Gabilondo + Jessica Bordier213 matchesnot enough data
Tiffany McKee + Cortney Shimunov303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Allison Glass
31W–7L career · 9 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.81
3
Cortney Shimunov
32W–3L career · 30 lines in 2026
<1%2%98%
3.30
3.5
Anna Camille Kerr
42W–28L career · 18 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
3
Ana Gabilondo
28W–28L career · 18 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
2.92
Hannah Juarez
79W–45L career · 27 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jessica Bordier
36W–9L career · 24 lines in 2026
not enough data
Julia Vera
22W–5L career · 19 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kate Colbert
53W–20L career · 13 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mariel Berdeja
21W–19L career · 17 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sara Kaltwasser
83W–47L career · 17 lines in 2026
not enough data
Tiffany McKee
16W–4L career · 17 lines in 2026
not enough data
Valeria Chavez
15W–2L career · 17 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.