Teams

College Station

2022 B · CS Adult 40 & Over League

18 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for CS Adult 40 & Over League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Donna Miller
published 3.5
3.26
Leanne Pool
published
Cherry Jackson
published 3.5
Elizabeth Burnett
published 3.5
3.15
Dana Pendleton
published 3.5
Cindy Skinner
published
Elizabeth Begley
published
Jana DeStefano
published
Jimmie Ward
published
Joyce Thomas
published
Kristina Walters
published
Laura Kubiak
published
Maegan Jackson
published
Patricia Davis
published
Roxie Johnson
published
Sara Dutch
published
Shay Simpson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shay Simpson + Roxie Johnson5073% gamesnot enough data
Elizabeth Begley + Jimmie Ward224 matchesnot enough data
Shay Simpson + Dana Pendleton123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Donna Miller
18W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%24%76%
3.59
Leanne Pool
14W–6L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Cherry Jackson
1W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Elizabeth Burnett
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Dana Pendleton
9W–8L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.15
Cindy Skinner
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Elizabeth Begley
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jana DeStefano
0W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jimmie Ward
5W–19L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Joyce Thomas
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kristina Walters
7W–12L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Laura Kubiak
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Maegan Jackson
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Patricia Davis
11W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Roxie Johnson
11W–12L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sara Dutch
7W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Shay Simpson
13W–11L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Ursula Winzer-Serhan
7W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.