Teams

DeWalt Spring 2025

2025 SOUTH EAST TENNIS ADULT 18 & OVER · WOMEN 2.5

10 players · average NTRP 2.62 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-05-19vs WalstonLost 02
L#1 SinglesLo DeWalt vs Caitie Connor4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Borges / Amanda Holliday vs Katrina Martinelli / Maddie Hoppert2-6, 1-6
2025-05-10vs Shields CFCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesAmanda Holliday / Ashley Outten vs Happy Clark / Shelly Dillon0-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesJulia Huffman vs Ashley Rahauser2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesNicole Aristy / Robin Bradley vs Anna Shields / Megan Konrady5-7, 6-1, 0-1
2025-05-05vs RAYWon 30
W#1 DoublesAshley Outten / Amanda Holliday vs Katherine Ray / Abigail Lindquist6-3, 7-5
W#1 SinglesNicole Aristy vs Nicole Mejia7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Borges / Casie Bickers vs YAEL UZIEL / Amy Ford6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2025-04-30vs GainerLost 03
L#1 DoublesLo DeWalt / Robin Bradley vs Helen Gainer / Kayla Kozup1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesLaurel Shambley vs Jennifer McCall3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Borges / Amanda Holliday vs Anjanette Spencer / Kimberly Bassano2-6, 0-6
2025-04-21vs RommelmeyerWon 20
W#1 DoublesJulia Huffman / Lo DeWalt vs Tammy Kuypers / Donalda Cairney6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAmanda Holliday / Nicole Aristy vs April Robbins / Katrina Summers7-5, 6-3
2025-04-09vs WalstonLost 03
L#1 DoublesCasie Bickers / Laurel Shambley vs Heather Balent / Kendra Goheen5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesRobin Bradley vs Kathleen Curley0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLo DeWalt / Ashley Outten vs Rachael Walston / Madison Stimson6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2025-04-05vs Shields CFCCLost 12
W#1 DoublesNicole Aristy / Julia Huffman vs Lily Murray / Beth Peele6-0, 6-4
L#1 SinglesAshley Outten vs Ashley Rahauser2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLo DeWalt / Amanda Holliday vs Sarah Bulluck / Shelly Dillon1-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-03-28vs RommelmeyerWon 21
W#1 DoublesBeth Saile / Amanda Holliday vs Donalda Cairney / Alexia Franzidis6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesNicole Aristy vs Giselle Journigan1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJulia Huffman / Ashley Outten vs Pamela Rommelmeyer / Katrina Summers6-2, 6-2
2025-03-24vs RAYLost 12
L#1 DoublesAmanda Holliday / Robin Bradley vs Kayla Barrio / Ashley Vargo6-1, 6-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesCasie Bickers vs MacKenzie Head2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesNicole Aristy / Beth Saile vs Erica O'Brien / Kristin Pinder2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-03-08vs GainerLost 03
L#1 DoublesLo DeWalt / Nicole Aristy vs Kayla Kozup / Danielle Scalfani6-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesBeth Saile vs Erin Shuttleworth4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAshley Outten / Julia Huffman vs Meagan Koch / Helen Gainer1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.25 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.48
Elizabeth Borges
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.46
Amanda Holliday
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.42
Beth Saile
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.39
Nicole Aristy
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
2.36
Julia Huffman
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.35
Ashley Outten
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.17
Lo DeWalt
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
2.17
Casie Bickers
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
1.99
Robin Bradley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
1.70
Laurel Shambley
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amanda Holliday + Elizabeth Borges5350% games−1.2% vs expected
Beth Saile + Amanda Holliday2343% gamesnot enough data
Lo DeWalt + Amanda Holliday134 matchesnot enough data
Julia Huffman + Ashley Outten123 matchesnot enough data
Ashley Outten + Lo DeWalt033 matchesnot enough data
Ashley Outten + Amanda Holliday123 matchesnot enough data
Casie Bickers + Laurel Shambley033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elizabeth Borges
31W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%57%43%
2.48
2.5
Amanda Holliday
27W–32L career · 8 lines in 2025
0%62%38%
2.46
3
Beth Saile
19W–25L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
72%28%<1%
2.42
Nicole Aristy
12W–13L career · 7 lines in 2025
78%22%<1%
2.39
Julia Huffman
7W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%84%16%
2.36
2.5
Ashley Outten
25W–27L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%86%14%
2.35
Lo DeWalt
13W–28L career · 7 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.17
2.5
Casie Bickers
6W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.17
Robin Bradley
2W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.99
Laurel Shambley
1W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.70

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.