Teams

Walston

2025 SOUTH EAST TENNIS ADULT 18 & OVER · WOMEN 2.5

13 players · average NTRP 2.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-05-19vs DeWalt Spring 2025Won 20
W#1 SinglesCaitie Connor vs Lo DeWalt6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKatrina Martinelli / Maddie Hoppert vs Elizabeth Borges / Amanda Holliday6-2, 6-1
2025-05-10vs GainerLost 02
L#1 DoublesKatrina Martinelli / Jaime Helms vs Anjanette Spencer / Kimberly Bassano1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesCaitie Connor vs Erin Shuttleworth2-6, 5-7
2025-05-06vs Shields CFCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesKatrina Martinelli / Denise Heye vs Allycen Garner / Lily Murray0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJaime Helms vs Catherine Mcmanus4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMaddie Hoppert / Madison Stimson vs Beth Peele / Lindsay Harkey2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-05-02vs RAYLost 02
L#1 DoublesKathleen Curley / Jaime Helms vs YAEL UZIEL / Kristin Pinder2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMelissa Flaugh / Elizabeth Colmer vs Erica O'Brien / Abigail Lindquist7-6, 5-7, 0-1
2025-04-30vs RommelmeyerWon 21
L#1 DoublesHeather Balent / Elizabeth Colmer vs Tammy Kuypers / Giselle Journigan6-7, 0-6
W#1 SinglesMadison Stimson vs Katrina Summers6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRachael Walston / Kendra Goheen vs Kim Smith / Donalda Cairney5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2025-04-09vs DeWalt Spring 2025Won 30
W#1 DoublesHeather Balent / Kendra Goheen vs Casie Bickers / Laurel Shambley7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKathleen Curley vs Robin Bradley6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesRachael Walston / Madison Stimson vs Lo DeWalt / Ashley Outten4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-04-05vs GainerWon 21
L#1 DoublesRachael Walston / Kendra Goheen vs Jennifer McCall / Anjanette Spencer4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesKatrina Martinelli vs Diane Byrd2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMadison Stimson / Cameron Smithwick vs Leslie Hamilton / Meagan Koch4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2025-03-28vs RAYWon 21
W#1 DoublesCameron Smithwick / Kathleen Curley vs Katherine Ray / Chanda Antoon6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesCaitie Connor vs Natalie Addy4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Colmer / Denise Heye vs Kristin Pinder / Nicole Mejia0-6, 0-6
2025-03-24vs Shields CFCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesMelissa Flaugh / Jaime Helms vs Brittany Rhodenhiser / Catherine Mcmanus6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesCaitie Connor vs Ashley Rahauser3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKatrina Martinelli / Cameron Smithwick vs Anna Shields / Megan Konrady6-2, 6-1
2025-03-08vs RommelmeyerWon 21
L#1 DoublesJaime Helms / Kathleen Curley vs Giselle Journigan / Diana Lancaster5-7, 2-6
W#1 SinglesHeather Balent vs Pamela Rommelmeyer6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKatrina Martinelli / Madison Stimson vs Anne McAllister / April Robbins2-6, 6-0, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.40 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.77
Kathleen Curley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.72
Caitie Connor
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.70
Katrina Martinelli
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.66
Cameron Smithwick
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.40
Jaime Helms
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
2.30
Kendra Goheen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.30
Madison Stimson
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
2.21
Rachael Walston
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.02
Denise Heye
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
1.97
Heather Balent
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Elizabeth Colmer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Maddie Hoppert
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Melissa Flaugh
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rachael Walston + Kendra Goheen224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathleen Curley
45W–13L career · 8 lines in 2025
0%3%97%
2.77
2.5
Caitie Connor
31W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%6%94%
2.72
Katrina Martinelli
9W–7L career · 6 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
2.70
2.5
Cameron Smithwick
31W–13L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
0%12%88%
2.66
Jaime Helms
19W–22L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%77%23%
2.40
Kendra Goheen
8W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%92%8%
2.30
Madison Stimson
14W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%93%7%
2.30
Rachael Walston
8W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.21
3
Denise Heye
1W–9L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
2.02
Heather Balent
4W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.97
Elizabeth Colmer
0W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Maddie Hoppert
5W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Melissa Flaugh
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.