Teams

LCTA40/Barrett/Maybank

2022 STA 40 & Over Combo Doubles · 40 & Over Combo Men - 7.5

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2022-08-08Lost 01
L#3 DoublesLance Tyner / Michael Newell vs Brian Hough / Christopher Geise4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-06-27vs LCTA40/Doran/LegendOaksLost 01
L#3 DoublesMatthew Hawkins / Lance Tyner vs Shaun Roberson / Eric Epstein4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Combo Men - 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.85 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.42
Kevin Stribling
published
4.20
Nicholas Connolly
published
4.17
Blair Jennings
published 4.5
4.07
William Barrett
published
3.96
Joseph Dennig
published
3.93
Matthew Hawkins
published
3.92
Chris Wigginton
published 4
3.59
John David Pfile
published
3.51
Robert Zielinski
published
3.32
Matt Fultz
published
3.22
Lance Tyner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Michael Newell
published
Todd Buikema
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John David Pfile + Chris Wigginton11459% games+17.0% vs expected
Kevin Stribling + William Barrett4163% games+12.7% vs expected
Matthew Hawkins + John David Pfile8159% games+9.5% vs expected
Matthew Hawkins + Chris Wigginton29761% games+7.5% vs expected
Kevin Stribling + Chris Wigginton5063% games+5.0% vs expected
William Barrett + Nicholas Connolly7060% games+5.0% vs expected
Blair Jennings + Joseph Dennig6069% gamesnot enough data
Kevin Stribling + Matthew Hawkins6075% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kevin Stribling
86W–30L career · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
4.42
Nicholas Connolly
37W–18L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
4.20
4.5
Blair Jennings
73W–45L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
4.17
William Barrett
43W–20L career · no lines in 2022
28%71%<1%
4.07
Joseph Dennig
12W–8L career · no lines in 2022
64%36%<1%
3.96
Matthew Hawkins
112W–30L career · no lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
3.93
4
Chris Wigginton
125W–66L career · no lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
3.92
John David Pfile
120W–64L career · no lines in 2022
24%75%<1%
3.59
Robert Zielinski
30W–36L career · no lines in 2022
46%54%<1%
3.51
Matt Fultz
57W–37L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Lance Tyner
284W–198L career · 2 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.22
Michael Newell
16W–29L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Todd Buikema
8W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.