← Search

Matt Fultz

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Charleston, SC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
203 matches · 120W–83L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history203 matches
L
2026-10-27 · LCTA39/Fanning/St. Andrews · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bruni Koch
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-10-26 · LCTA18/Fultz-Edge/Maybank · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-10-19 · LCTA18/Fultz-Edge/Maybank · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Austin Ruddy
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-10-13 · LCTA39/Fanning/St. Andrews · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anand Achanti
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-10-12 · LCTA18/Fultz-Edge/Maybank · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Richard Barto
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-09-29 · LCTA39/Fanning/St. Andrews · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ben Fanning
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-23 · LCTA39/Tyner-Keiper/Maybank · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Usher
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-09-21 · LCTA18/Fultz-Edge/Maybank · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Timothy DeCamp
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-09-18 · #3 Doubles · with Scott Usher
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-09-17 · LCTA40/Sweet-Goodman/Maybank · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Justin McInnis
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-09-13 · LCTA40/Sweet-Goodman/Maybank · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Justin McInnis
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-31 · LCTA40/Wright/Maybank · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Thomas Rountree
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 1-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
60.1%
86W–57L · 55.5% of games
4.0
47.8%
11W–12L · 48.4% of games
6.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 50.7% of games
7.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 55.8% of games
3.5mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 50.6% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
60%
6W–4L · 52.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 29% of the time
#3 Doubles
29%
59 matches
#1 Singles
22%
44 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
43 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
29 matches
#2 Singles
11%
22 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King