← Search

Justin McInnis

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Charleston, SC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
116 matches · 85W–31L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history116 matches
W
2026-10-27 · LCTA18/Sweet/Maybank · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ryan Loehr
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-0
W
2026-10-22 · LCTA39/Facello-Bejar/Maybank · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michael Sweet
loading the estimate
0-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-10-20 · LCTA18/Sweet/Maybank · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Connor Kreese
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-10-19 · LCTA39/Facello-Bejar/Maybank · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michael Sweet
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-10-09 · LCTA39/Facello-Bejar/Maybank · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chris Facello
loading the estimate
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-06 · LCTA18/Sweet/Maybank · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ryan Loehr
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-09-30 · LCTA39/Wright-Harris/Maybank · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Art Moore
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-29 · LCTA18/Sweet/Maybank · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chris Paddrik
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-22 · LCTA18/Sweet/Maybank · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ryan Loehr
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-17 · LCTA40/Sweet-Goodman/Maybank · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Matt Fultz
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-6
L
2026-09-16 · LCTA18/Facello/Maybank · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tanner Snidow
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-13 · LCTA40/Sweet-Goodman/Maybank · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Matt Fultz
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
85.7%
12W–2L · 67.5% of games
3.0
70.8%
34W–14L · 59% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
91.7%
11W–1L · 58.2% of games
6.5
64.7%
11W–6L · 51.6% of games
2.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
64.3%
9W–5L · 55.6% of games
6.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 64% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
54 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
22 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe