Teams

Br.Li55A

2025 Capital Adult 55 & Over · 3.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-04-21vs Mi.Fitzgerald55ASplit 11
W#1 DoublesBrenda Li / Jennifer Kuzma vs Molly Grundner / Kim Ledlow6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAmy Trail / Michelle Yates vs Jennifer Hensley / Beate Steffen1-6, 3-6
2025-04-14vs Ca.Werder55AWon 20
W#1 DoublesAdrienne Todd / Brenda Li vs Leslie Corn / Daphne Driscoll6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAnn Gray / Amy Trail vs Nancy Gugliotta / Marilyn Slaymaker6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2025-03-28vs Sh.Cole55AWon 10
W#2 DoublesKelly Polizzi / Dale Martin vs Gwen Noble / Julie Shuey6-0, 7-5
2025-03-24vs Ad.Whitten55AWon 20
W#1 DoublesBrenda Li / Amy Barclay vs Kathy Garnier / Mari Jameel6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJannette White / Kelly Polizzi vs Lori Elliott / Patricia Smith6-4, 6-3
2025-03-10vs An.Ashburn55AWon 20
W#1 DoublesBrenda Li / Kelly Polizzi vs Deanna Drescher / Rachel Pisciotta6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJannette White / Amy Trail vs Jennifer Fogleman / Lori Bourne3-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Jennifer Kuzma
published
3.53
Brenda Li
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.44
Amy Barclay
published 3.5
3.42
Adrienne Todd
published 3.5
3.41
Ann Gray
published 3.5
3.34
Dale Martin
published 3.5
3.24
Joey Gibson
published
3.10
Amy Trail
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.09
Michelle Yates
published
3.02
Kelly Polizzi
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Adrienne Todd + Jennifer Kuzma314 matchesnot enough data
Adrienne Todd + Brenda Li213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Kuzma
66W–71L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.80
3.5
Brenda Li
278W–108L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.53
3.5
Amy Barclay
30W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Adrienne Todd
44W–21L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Ann Gray
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.41
3.5
Dale Martin
24W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.34
Joey Gibson
6W–12L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Amy Trail
135W–112L career · 3 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.10
Michelle Yates
8W–7L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.09
3.5
Kelly Polizzi
95W–142L career · 3 lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.02

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.