Teams

Moukad/Ahl

2023 55&Over Women Metro · 7.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.25 / METROPOLITAN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-08-29vs Gould/TharinLost 12
L#1 DoublesPam Widener / Lorri Ahl vs Elizabeth Gormley / Gail Shube3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesElizete Groenendaal / Ellen Amstutz vs Patricia Gould / Jeanne Straus6-7, 4-2
L#3 DoublesMelanie Petsch / Lucy Dew vs Ilene Miklos / Irene Zimmet3-6, 2-6
2023-08-24vs Metro: Lem/ChenLost 03
L#1 DoublesKendall Gastelu / Lucy Dew vs Janet Miller / Nerissa Lem1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesLysa Scarselli / Melanie Petsch vs Christine Rodeo / Helen Xu6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRosemary Moukad / Katya Bankowsky vs Chih-Wei Chen / Jane Whearty1-6, 4-6
2023-08-14vs Metro: Lem/ChenLost 03
L#1 DoublesPam Widener / Elizete Groenendaal vs Jennifer Mao / Janet Miller0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLysa Scarselli / Nancy Aranow vs Christine Rodeo / Helen Xu1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRosemary Moukad / Kendall Gastelu vs Susan Chee / Jane Whearty4-6, 3-6
2023-08-10vs Gould/TharinWon 21
L#1 DoublesPam Widener / Nancy Aranow vs Kathie McDermott-Greene / Catherine Gillett7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRosemary Moukad / Kathryn Gayner vs Jeanne Straus / Ilene Miklos6-3, 5-7
W#3 DoublesLysa Scarselli / Katya Bankowsky vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-08-03vs Metro: Lem/ChenLost 03
L#1 DoublesGigi Gardon / Lorri Ahl vs Susan Greenberg / Cathi Sussman4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesNancy Aranow / Pam Widener vs Annette Delgado / Bella Tia4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLucy Dew / Kathryn Gayner vs Susan Chee / Nerissa Lem4-6, 4-6
2023-07-24vs Gould/TharinWon 21
W#1 DoublesLorri Ahl / Gigi Gardon vs Kate Green / Justine Cooper6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTracey Thatcher / Pam Widener vs Elizabeth Gormley / Catherine Tharin6-4, 4-6
L#3 DoublesEllen Amstutz / Elizete Groenendaal vs Irene Zimmet / Alexandra MacDonnell3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 7.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Metro: Lem/Chen061626126
2Gould/Tharin066919172
3Moukad/Ahl0621329189

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Pam Widener
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.30
Kendall Gastelu
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.29
Ellen Amstutz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Gigi Gardon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Tracey Thatcher
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Lysa Scarselli
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.98
Kathryn Gayner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.97
Lorri Ahl
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Elizete Groenendaal
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.68
Nancy Aranow
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.67
Rosemary Moukad
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.60
Melanie Petsch
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.57
Lucy Dew
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathryn Gayner + Elizete Groenendaal4452% games+12.4% vs expected
Lorri Ahl + Rosemary Moukad11459% games+4.0% vs expected
Lorri Ahl + Lucy Dew2349% games+1.6% vs expected
Lorri Ahl + Kathryn Gayner8461% games−6.9% vs expected
Lucy Dew + Rosemary Moukad1543% games−11.4% vs expected
Ellen Amstutz + Elizete Groenendaal3536% games−11.5% vs expected
Gigi Gardon + Lorri Ahl224 matchesnot enough data
Lorri Ahl + Melanie Petsch134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Pam Widener
112W–84L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%60%40%
3.47
Kendall Gastelu
33W–26L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Ellen Amstutz
14W–26L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Gigi Gardon
4W–10L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Tracey Thatcher
24W–22L career · 1 line in 2023
9%90%1%
3.17
3
Lysa Scarselli
132W–79L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%39%61%
3.04
Kathryn Gayner
64W–32L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%57%43%
2.98
Lorri Ahl
104W–81L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Elizete Groenendaal
119W–105L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%91%9%
2.82
3
Nancy Aranow
66W–138L career · 3 lines in 2023
8%91%1%
2.68
Rosemary Moukad
57W–83L career · 3 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
2.67
Melanie Petsch
21W–30L career · 2 lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
2.60
Lucy Dew
70W–93L career · 3 lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
2.57

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.