Teams

ROUND HILL CC 40AW3.5A

2025 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 3.5

17 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-03-08vs FREMONT TC 40AW3.5BLost 01
L#1 DoublesSusie Hansen / Kristen Loughmiller vs Ella Hurd / Rose Keogh3-6, 1-6
2025-02-23vs HARBOR BAY 40AW3.5ALost 01
L#2 DoublesMickie Kerr / Shawn Young vs Katherine Hwang / Pooja Tendulkar2-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Wendy Gulden
published
3.63
Viviana Meyer
published
3.42
Jill Carlstrom
published
3.42
Marci Dublin
published
3.41
Sunita Mistry
published
3.36
3.33
Shawn Young
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Susie Hansen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Allene Rognon
published 3.5
3.32
Heidi Kapust
published
3.30
Cecily Barclay
published 3.5
Ali Rago
published 3.5
3.19
Sarah Shapiro
published
3.15
Kerry Marx
published
3.14
Yolla Elahmadie
published
3.13
Tami Finegold
published
3.12
Wendy Greer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marci Dublin + Heidi Kapust7262% games+10.5% vs expected
Sunita Mistry + Viviana Meyer5255% games+6.3% vs expected
Heidi Kapust + Jill Carlstrom5153% games+4.4% vs expected
Allene Rognon + Marci Dublin5159% games+3.3% vs expected
Jill Carlstrom + Susie Hansen4160% games+1.1% vs expected
Marci Dublin + Shawn Young3258% gamesnot enough data
Shawn Young + Heidi Kapust134 matchesnot enough data
Yolla Elahmadie + Jill Carlstrom123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Wendy Gulden
16W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.70
Viviana Meyer
14W–13L career · no lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.63
Jill Carlstrom
16W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.42
Marci Dublin
24W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%72%27%
3.42
Sunita Mistry
18W–14L career · no lines in 2025
74%26%<1%
3.41
3.5
Caroline D Sherbourne
9W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.36
Shawn Young
21W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
Susie Hansen
20W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
3.5
Allene Rognon
12W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Heidi Kapust
18W–13L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Cecily Barclay
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Ali Rago
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sarah Shapiro
11W–10L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
Kerry Marx
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.15
Yolla Elahmadie
5W–18L career · no lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.14
Tami Finegold
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.13
Wendy Greer
14W–14L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.12

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.