Teams

TTC-Cervantes

2025 MIXED 18 & Over · 7.0 MIXED DOUBLES

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTHERN OREGON

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-10-05vs ACB-HarneyLost 12
L#1 DoublesLouis Tanselli / Dianne Tanselli vs Douglas Beck / Lisa Johannessen0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAllison Walkingshaw / Clayton Havens vs Cristopher Oliveira / Kendra Gulley2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesChris Andrus / Victoria Milburn vs Rich Akers / Blaire Nichols7-6, 6-2
2024-10-05vs S OR-ESTC-MidwoodLost 12
L#1 DoublesDianne Tanselli / Louis Tanselli vs Alexander Brunot / Courtney Hohenlohe Langenburg3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAllison Walkingshaw / Clayton Havens vs Cary Midwood / Lela Fossett3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJanet Lui-Hansen / Chris Andrus vs Cory Stores / Kara Dokos6-4, 7-5
2024-10-04vs ESTC-SatherLost 03
L#1 DoublesVictoria Milburn / Michael Wing vs Tracy Muilenburg / Diego Muilenburg2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBrandy Cervantes / Sam Bell vs Evangeline Laurie / Santiago Jaramillo3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMelissa Pohl / Chris Andrus vs Margaret Newton / Brendan Adamczyk1-6, 2-6
2024-10-04vs ESTC-ChanceLost 03
L#1 DoublesAllison Walkingshaw / Clayton Havens vs John Follett / Ashley Backlund6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesVictoria Milburn / Michael Wing vs Jeff Ziller / Christina Spencer1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBrandy Cervantes / Sam Bell vs Ronald Bodeen / Karen Bodeen4-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 7.0 MIXED DOUBLES
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1S OR-ESTC-Midwood40102785
2ESTC-Sather22751190
3ESTC-Chance227514113
4ACB-Harney224818124
5TTC-Cervantes0421020131

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Janet Lui-Hansen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.35
Clayton Havens
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Chris Andrus
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Sam Bell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.13
Victoria Milburn
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.11
Melissa Pohl
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Allison Walkingshaw
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.05
Dianne Tanselli
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.89
Brandy Cervantes
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Louis Tanselli
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Wing
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dianne Tanselli + Louis Tanselli2643% gamesnot enough data
Melissa Pohl + Louis Tanselli123 matchesnot enough data
Clayton Havens + Allison Walkingshaw033 matchesnot enough data
Clayton Havens + Brandy Cervantes123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Janet Lui-Hansen
42W–57L career · 4 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.59
3.5
Clayton Havens
11W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%86%14%
3.35
3.5
Chris Andrus
6W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Sam Bell
10W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Victoria Milburn
14W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Melissa Pohl
55W–108L career · 1 line in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
3.5
Allison Walkingshaw
9W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
3.5
Dianne Tanselli
18W–68L career · 2 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.05
3
Brandy Cervantes
9W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.89
Louis Tanselli
12W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael Wing
0W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.