Teams

TRC:Doubles or Nothing:Zwart

2025 SCT Adult 55 & Over Women - Weekend · 7.0 55 & Over Women - 1

17 players · average NTRP 3.33 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-07-27vs Q MRC:Retro Slammers:Islam/HawleyLost 12
L#1 DoublesDale Norton / Margaret Mehai vs Nancy Hawley / Silvia Islam1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLoretta Bohnen / Lisa Chen vs Laurie Walls / Mary Gunzy6-0, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNorma Zwart / Misao Naito vs Nancy Anderson / Jennifer StephenTorpey7-5, 5-7, 0-1
2025-07-13vs MIT:In It To Win It: Nava/HavenLost 03
L#1 DoublesPriscilla Twombly / Misao Naito vs Lynn Atkins / Nadine Morandi2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDale Norton / Janice Lucchesi vs Arla Wiles / Linda Dest4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesNorma Zwart / Nelida Reyes-Matos vs Stefanie Kreiger / CHRISTINE CHARLES0-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesMisao Naito / Priscilla Twombly vs Anna Eliseenkova / Karen Greenblatt7-6, 6-6
L#2 DoublesDale Norton / Diana Jackson vs Hiam Asmar / Myra Goldberg2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMary Lou Ramery / Norma Zwart vs Joanna Douglas / Marcia Hamelin3-6, 5-7
2025-06-15vs GF:Kiss My Ace 2:Goodrich/BlackLost 03
L#1 DoublesLoretta Bohnen / Tina Rivera vs Maureen Goodrich / Debbie Kelly4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesPriscilla Twombly / Laurie Perry vs Celia Ponvert / Suzanne Black3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesNelida Reyes-Matos / Margaret Mehai vs Deborah Montenegro / Leanne Jolin2-6, 3-6
2025-06-01vs MRC:Ageless Aces:DowdWon 21
L#1 DoublesNorma Zwart / Kerstin Lebel vs Audra Edele / Melodie McVerry2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMary Matera / Priscilla Twombly vs Jeanine Powers / Priti Ghatlia6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDale Norton / Janice Lucchesi vs AMY MCCORMACK / Kathleen Dowd6-3, 6-3
2025-05-18vs Q MRC:Retro Slammers:Islam/HawleyLost 02
L#1 DoublesPriscilla Twombly / Mary Lou Ramery vs Trish Rosa / Diane Sullivan6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMargaret Mehai / Cheryl Dziubina vs Jackie Donnelly / Lisa Moore3-6, 0-6
2025-05-04vs MRC:Ageless Aces:DowdWon 21
W#1 DoublesKerstin Lebel / Diana Jackson vs Patricia Fusco / Elizabeth Cochrane6-7, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDale Norton / Margaret Mehai vs AMY MCCORMACK / Melinda Grice6-7, 4-4
W#3 DoublesNorma Zwart / Tina Rivera vs Jacqueline Mulhall / Michele Logan6-4, 6-3
2025-04-27vs MIT:In It To Win It: Nava/HavenLost 03
L#1 DoublesDale Norton / Priscilla Twombly vs Terry Nolan / Stefanie Kreiger0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKerstin Lebel / Diana Jackson vs Antonina Korepina / Tanyia Pino1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLoretta Bohnen / Cheryl Dziubina vs Jean Bacon / Nadine Morandi2-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesTina Rivera / Loretta Bohnen vs Elizabeth Jaykus / Marcia Hamelin4-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJanice Lucchesi / Margaret Mehai vs Carol Baldwin / Joanna Douglas5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMary Lou Ramery / Diana Jackson vs Hiam Asmar / Lauren Zirn6-2, 6-4
2025-03-23vs GF:Kiss My Ace 2:Goodrich/BlackLost 12
L#1 DoublesLisa Chen / Priscilla Twombly vs Maureen Goodrich / Kate Piironen3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Tibbetts / Loretta Bohnen vs Wendy Chicosky / Debbie Kelly2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesDale Norton / Janice Lucchesi vs Jennifer Young / Toni Rivera6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · 7.0 55 & Over Women - 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
14S:Love To Play:Ortiz/Giff0814925218
2CP:55 Shades of Play:Stone08111227206
3CP:Acing Gracefully:Sansone08121229223
4CP:Simply Smashing:Catto/Swanson0881634233
5GF:Kiss My Ace 2:Goodrich/Black01022718227
6MIT:In It To Win It: Nava/Haven010191125237
7Q MRC:Retro Slammers:Islam/Hawley010161433268
8MRC:Ageless Aces:Dowd010121636294
9WRC:Sorry Not Sorry:Hamelin/Eliseenkova010101941318
10TRC:Doubles or Nothing:Zwart01082043309

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Tina Rivera
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.20
Mary Matera
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Priscilla Twombly
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.10
Misao Naito
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.07
Mary Lou Ramery
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.02
Dale Norton
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
2.92
Loretta Bohnen
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.86
Cheryl Dziubina
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.69
Margaret Mehai
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.63
Nelida Reyes-Matos
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Diana Jackson
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Janice Lucchesi
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Kerstin Lebel
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Laurie Perry
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Lisa Chen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Norma Zwart
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Susan Tibbetts
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dale Norton + Tina Rivera4452% games+3.0% vs expected
Dale Norton + Loretta Bohnen2546% games−0.2% vs expected
Misao Naito + Priscilla Twombly101246% games−3.1% vs expected
Mary Lou Ramery + Loretta Bohnen61449% games−4.3% vs expected
Margaret Mehai + Dale Norton3647% games−4.5% vs expected
Margaret Mehai + Priscilla Twombly2642% games−5.9% vs expected
Loretta Bohnen + Priscilla Twombly7951% games−9.7% vs expected
Norma Zwart + Priscilla Twombly81148% games−9.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tina Rivera
101W–124L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
Mary Matera
31W–27L career · 1 line in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
Priscilla Twombly
64W–89L career · 7 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.12
Misao Naito
38W–63L career · 4 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.10
Mary Lou Ramery
12W–31L career · 3 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.07
3.5
Dale Norton
52W–104L career · 7 lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.02
Loretta Bohnen
52W–78L career · 5 lines in 2025
74%26%<1%
2.92
3.5
Cheryl Dziubina
17W–38L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
87%13%<1%
2.86
Margaret Mehai
48W–88L career · 5 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
2.69
Nelida Reyes-Matos
32W–86L career · 2 lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
2.63
3
Diana Jackson
12W–27L career · 5 lines in 2025
15%84%<1%
2.63
Janice Lucchesi
49W–72L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kerstin Lebel
34W–41L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Laurie Perry
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Lisa Chen
4W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Norma Zwart
32W–63L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Tibbetts
19W–37L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.