Teams

GF:Kiss My Ace 2:Goodrich/Black

2025 SCT Adult 55 & Over Women - Weekend · 7.0 55 & Over Women - 1

16 players · average NTRP 3.58 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-07-27vs MRC:Ageless Aces:DowdLost 12
L#1 DoublesMaureen Goodrich / Kate Piironen vs AMY MCCORMACK / Pam Wilcox6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesCelia Ponvert / Tanya Flynn vs Hyoun Choe / Patricia Fusco6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLeanne Jolin / Deborah Montenegro vs Lisa Frisbie / Pauline Hudson6-7, 5-3
2025-07-13vs Q MRC:Retro Slammers:Islam/HawleyWon 21
L#1 DoublesMaureen Goodrich / Wendy Chicosky vs Lisa Moore / Jennifer StephenTorpey7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDani Woods / Tanya Flynn vs Karyn Detje / Dana Manning6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDeborah Montenegro / Jennifer Young vs Kathy Bennett / Trish Rosa6-4, 2-1
2025-06-29vs MIT:In It To Win It: Nava/HavenLost 12
L#1 DoublesMaureen Goodrich / Wendy Chicosky vs Jean Bacon / Linda Dest0-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDani Woods / Suzanne Black vs Janice Lareau / Julie Bastarache7-5, 7-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Anthony Park / Amy Blume vs Nadine Morandi / Lynn Atkins1-6, 1-6
2025-06-15vs TRC:Doubles or Nothing:ZwartWon 30
W#1 DoublesMaureen Goodrich / Debbie Kelly vs Loretta Bohnen / Tina Rivera6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCelia Ponvert / Suzanne Black vs Priscilla Twombly / Laurie Perry6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDeborah Montenegro / Leanne Jolin vs Nelida Reyes-Matos / Margaret Mehai6-2, 6-3
W#1 DoublesKate Piironen / Wendy Chicosky vs Joanna Douglas / Dara Lieberson6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSuzanne Black / Celia Ponvert vs Karen Greenblatt / Margaret Woolverton6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKaren Anthony Park / Toni Rivera vs Anna Eliseenkova / Kelly Fagan6-0, 5-7, 1-0
2025-05-18vs MRC:Ageless Aces:DowdWon 21
W#1 DoublesMaureen Goodrich / Toni Rivera vs Priti Ghatlia / Jeanine Powers6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDeborah Montenegro / Kate Piironen vs Jacqueline Mulhall / Jodi Wasserstein6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLeanne Jolin / Debbie Kelly vs Lisa Frisbie / Melinda Grice6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 DoublesMaureen Goodrich / Debbie Kelly vs Carol Baldwin / Lisa Metz6-4, 5-5
L#2 DoublesWendy Chicosky / Toni Rivera vs Anna Eliseenkova / Kelly Fagan6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAmy Blume / Susan Dellenbaugh vs Nancy Bento / Margaret Woolverton6-2, 7-5
2025-05-04vs Q MRC:Retro Slammers:Islam/HawleyWon 30
W#1 DoublesMaureen Goodrich / Kate Piironen vs Lisa Arconti / Nancy Anderson2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSuzanne Black / Dani Woods vs Mary Gunzy / Susan Daly6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAmy Blume / Susan Dellenbaugh vs Janet Zupkus / Julie Curtis6-3, 6-0
2025-04-06vs MIT:In It To Win It: Nava/HavenWon 30
W#1 DoublesMaureen Goodrich / Kate Piironen vs Lynn Atkins / Julie Bastarache6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesSuzanne Black / Celia Ponvert vs Maggie Nava / Antonina Korepina6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAmy Blume / Toni Rivera vs Susan Haven / Dika Nussberg6-3, 6-3
2025-03-23vs TRC:Doubles or Nothing:ZwartWon 21
W#1 DoublesMaureen Goodrich / Kate Piironen vs Lisa Chen / Priscilla Twombly6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesWendy Chicosky / Debbie Kelly vs Susan Tibbetts / Loretta Bohnen6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJennifer Young / Toni Rivera vs Dale Norton / Janice Lucchesi1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · 7.0 55 & Over Women - 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
14S:Love To Play:Ortiz/Giff0814925218
2CP:55 Shades of Play:Stone08111227206
3CP:Acing Gracefully:Sansone08121229223
4CP:Simply Smashing:Catto/Swanson0881634233
5GF:Kiss My Ace 2:Goodrich/Black01022718227
6MIT:In It To Win It: Nava/Haven010191125237
7Q MRC:Retro Slammers:Islam/Hawley010161433268
8MRC:Ageless Aces:Dowd010121636294
9WRC:Sorry Not Sorry:Hamelin/Eliseenkova010101941318
10TRC:Doubles or Nothing:Zwart01082043309

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Celia Ponvert
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.66
Dani Woods
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.42
Maureen Goodrich
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Wendy Chicosky
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.33
Kate Piironen
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.17
Deborah Montenegro
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.14
Debbie Kelly
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.10
Leanne Jolin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.07
Amy Blume
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.96
Suzanne Black
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published
2.76
Tanya Flynn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.72
Mary Glidden
published 3
Jennifer Young
published
Karen Anthony Park
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Dellenbaugh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Toni Rivera
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deborah Montenegro + Kate Piironen12956% games+5.3% vs expected
Deborah Montenegro + Maureen Goodrich4266% games+3.0% vs expected
Celia Ponvert + Suzanne Black6162% games+2.8% vs expected
Susan Dellenbaugh + Amy Blume4357% games+1.4% vs expected
Maureen Goodrich + Debbie Kelly10754% games+0.4% vs expected
Amy Blume + Debbie Kelly3454% games+0.3% vs expected
Toni Rivera + Wendy Chicosky4257% games−1.5% vs expected
Wendy Chicosky + Maureen Goodrich5257% games−2.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Celia Ponvert
172W–104L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.87
4
Dani Woods
132W–120L career · 3 lines in 2025
13%87%1%
3.66
Maureen Goodrich
127W–66L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
Wendy Chicosky
54W–28L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.35
Kate Piironen
66W–49L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Deborah Montenegro
73W–63L career · 4 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.17
3.5
Debbie Kelly
61W–69L career · 4 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.14
Leanne Jolin
39W–50L career · 3 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
3.5
Amy Blume
21W–29L career · 4 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.07
Suzanne Black
82W–49L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
2.96
Tanya Flynn
96W–68L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.76
3
Mary Glidden
27W–64L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Jennifer Young
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Karen Anthony Park
4W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Dellenbaugh
35W–56L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Toni Rivera
40W–38L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.