Teams

LA - Shadow's Aces

2023 SoCal Tri-Level - LA · LA - Women 4.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.70 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-09-24vs LA-LLW-Queen Anne-Diana ChowLost 01
L#1 DoublesKathleen Foy-Asaro / Aurore Connor vs Lisa Licht / Tivy Wong6-7, 3-6
2023-08-27vs LA - No Strings AttachedWon 10
W#1 DoublesAurore Connor / Shirley Fong vs Michele Sherman / Shubha Chick4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-08-06vs LA - Ace AngelsLost 01
L#1 DoublesShirley Fong / Aurore Connor vs Carol Ecker / Lupe Lopez6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2023-07-23vs LA - No Strings AttachedLost 01
L#1 DoublesAurore Connor / Shirley Fong vs Carrel Hoffman / Claire Weis6-0, 6-7, 0-1
2023-07-16vs LA - Triple ThreatLost 01
L#2 DoublesTina Jackson / Kathleen Foy-Asaro vs Mylene Moreno / Ilene Rosenzweig3-6, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.08
Shirley Fong
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.78
VICKY TRINH
published 4
3.45
Michelle Crossman
published
3.29
Ashley Louie
published 3.5
3.26
Kathleen Foy-Asaro
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.18
Susan Warner
published
3.10
Jenny Bond
published
3.09
Maria Starn
published
3.05
Mia Babilonia
published
2.73
Andrea Bardack
published 3
Kaleigh Malloy
published
Lisa Melchior
published
Nichole Carlin
published
Tina Jackson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

VICKY TRINH + Shirley Fong11259% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Shirley Fong
89W–47L career · 3 lines in 2023
27%72%<1%
4.08
4
VICKY TRINH
163W–101L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.78
Michelle Crossman
6W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%<1%>99%
3.45
3.5
Ashley Louie
18W–19L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Kathleen Foy-Asaro
172W–163L career · 5 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.26
Susan Warner
18W–21L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
Jenny Bond
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.10
Maria Starn
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.09
Mia Babilonia
6W–15L career · no lines in 2023
0%<1%>99%
3.05
3
Andrea Bardack
8W–12L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.73
Kaleigh Malloy
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lisa Melchior
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Nichole Carlin
3W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tina Jackson
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.