Teams

SS-LT BLUE

2025 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER

13 players · average NTRP 3.86 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-28vs PRKR NAVYLost 04
L#1 DoublesReagan Harper / Brian Swift vs Aksh T Patel / Manish Sharma3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMatt Worrell vs Alex Hmyrak7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPaul Lee / Richard Stromp vs Ryan Lum / Srinivasa Nadendla1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesNathan Medin vs Ankit Koul0-6, 1-6
2025-05-14vs HRCA-S GREENLost 13
L#1 DoublesJoe Dawson / Matt Worrell vs Jeff Aberle / Alex Treichel6-7, 6-7
L#1 SinglesCharles Phanumphai vs Marshall Nichols3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesReagan Harper / Brian Swift vs Matt Nelsen / Ryan Griffin2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesNathan Medin / Brad Rule vs Heyden Pue / Brandon Neff6-3, 6-1
2025-05-07vs CPV REDWon 32
W#1 DoublesJoe Dawson / Matt Worrell vs Nathan Herr / Brandt Payne6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesCharles Phanumphai vs Michael Gersack6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRichard Stromp / Brian Swift vs Lance Bourque / Jonathan Landis7-6, 7-6
L#2 SinglesDan Murphy vs Ryan Shirley2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesPaul Lee / Shannon Stanley vs Edward Kolb / Gregory Moseley2-6, 1-6
2025-04-30vs PCRK YELLOWWon 31
W#1 DoublesBrian Swift / Matt Worrell vs Todd Campbell / Kane Lai6-4, 7-5
W#1 SinglesCharles Phanumphai vs David Morgan6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesReagan Harper / Brad Rule vs James Shaw / Bob Keith7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDan Murphy / Richard Stromp vs Andrew Smolenski / Alexander Slowatek2-6, 2-6
2025-04-23vs PRC REDLost 23
W#1 DoublesNathan Medin / John Baker vs Steve Caffrey / Scott Mannix6-3, 7-5
L#1 SinglesMatt Worrell vs Mike Wilson6-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesShannon Stanley / Brian Swift vs Scott Heck / Ryan McKeown5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 SinglesCharles Phanumphai vs Nabeel Meghji6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKeith Robertson / Richard Stromp vs Ian Dyer / Jeremy Mayoss4-6, 4-6
2025-04-16vs DCHS GOLDLost 12
L#1 SinglesCharles Phanumphai vs Vishal Rawal4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesBrian Swift / Matt Worrell vs Isidre Baques / Steve Witter2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKeith Robertson / Nathan Medin vs Brian Varner / Michael Pistilli5-7, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Randy Schumaker
published 4
3.87
Matt Worrell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.86
Brian Swift
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Brad Rule
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.68
Charles Phanumphai
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4
3.67
Shannon Stanley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.66
Nathan Medin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.65
Jeff Hamilton
published
3.65
Reagan Harper
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.50
Dan Murphy
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.41
Richard Stromp
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.30
Keith Robertson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Joe Dawson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nathan Medin + Brad Rule6160% games+14.4% vs expected
Randy Schumaker + Shannon Stanley6162% games+8.1% vs expected
Brian Swift + Randy Schumaker5255% games+4.8% vs expected
Joe Dawson + Matt Worrell224 matchesnot enough data
Keith Robertson + Brian Swift134 matchesnot enough data
Randy Schumaker + Nathan Medin404 matchesnot enough data
Joe Dawson + Brian Swift123 matchesnot enough data
Richard Stromp + Jeff Hamilton213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Randy Schumaker
97W–34L career · no lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.94
Matt Worrell
13W–8L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.87
4
Brian Swift
23W–24L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.86
4
Brad Rule
7W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Charles Phanumphai
73W–37L career · 5 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Shannon Stanley
9W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
4
Nathan Medin
45W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.66
Jeff Hamilton
10W–8L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.65
Reagan Harper
16W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.65
3.5
Dan Murphy
5W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.50
3.5
Richard Stromp
26W–40L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.41
Keith Robertson
2W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
Joe Dawson
7W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.