Teams

PCRK YELLOW

2025 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.88 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-21vs PRC REDLost 12
W#1 DoublesTodd Campbell / Alexander Slowatek vs Rick Wolfgang / Mike Wilson6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDean Schafer / Andrew Smolenski vs Steve Caffrey / Ryan McKeown6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesHoang Nguyen / Jeffrey Davis vs Chad Smith / Ian Dyer4-6, 3-6
2025-05-14vs DCHS GOLDSplit 22
W#1 DoublesBob Keith / Hoang Nguyen vs Kevin Hodnett / Mark Kostecki6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTodd Campbell / Dean Schafer vs Michael Pistilli / Mark Smith3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesLandon Voigt vs Jared Arkell3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAndrew Smolenski / Jeffrey Davis vs Glen Erickson / Brian Varner6-2, 0-6, 0-1
2025-05-07vs PRKR NAVYLost 04
L#1 DoublesAlexander Slowatek / Kane Lai vs Ram Parashar / Srinivasa Nadendla6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesHoang Nguyen vs Praveen Tyagi3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesBob Keith / Andrew Smolenski vs Alex Hmyrak / Jeff Bille4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJeffrey Davis / Dean Schafer vs Hariharan Kannan / Kumar Verma1-6, 3-6
2025-04-30vs SS-LT BLUELost 13
L#1 DoublesTodd Campbell / Kane Lai vs Brian Swift / Matt Worrell4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJames Shaw / Bob Keith vs Reagan Harper / Brad Rule6-7, 4-6
L#2 SinglesLandon Voigt vs John Baker1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesAndrew Smolenski / Alexander Slowatek vs Dan Murphy / Richard Stromp6-2, 6-2
2025-04-23vs HRCA-S GREENLost 14
L#1 DoublesDean Schafer / Bob Keith vs Jeff Aberle / Alex Treichel5-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesLandon Voigt vs William Harllee4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTodd Campbell / James Shaw vs Rohit Dass / Matt Nelsen4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 SinglesHoang Nguyen vs Daniel Burns7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAndrew Smolenski / Jeffrey Davis vs Brandon Neff / Heyden Pue1-6, 4-6
2025-04-16vs CPV REDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesDean Schafer / James Shaw vs Brian McDonald / Michael Gersack6-7, 2-6
W#1 SinglesLandon Voigt vs Nathan Herr7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTodd Campbell / Jeffrey Davis vs Lance Bourque / Azim Khan0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesHoang Nguyen / Andrew Smolenski vs Gregory Moseley / Mark Voss6-7, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings20 teams · MEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1DTC NAVY6130516227
2APR-MW BLUE6126926283
3BVP GREEN61221331289
4SS-LGT PURPLE61201534316
5BTA-C ORANGE5123718232
6HRCA-S GREEN51201024254
7KC-CC BRONZE52221331297
8BM ORANGE43191636296
9KC-CC NAVY43171840327
10BTA-IBM GOLD34171839289
11KC-CC SILVER34181741339
12CACM GREY34142146336
13LTC-M RED24131739297
14PCRK YELLOW2482247312
15MC BRONZE25142142299
16MEA ORANGE25132247351
17SKY SILVER2592657391
18LTA-Q YELLOW1662958379
19KC-CC GOLD07122348349
20SS-LGT GREEN07112452369

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Hoang Nguyen
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
3.79
Alexander Slowatek
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.78
Dean Schafer
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.68
Bob Keith
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.59
Jon Szumny
published
3.57
Andrew Smolenski
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.49
James Shaw
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.25
Jeffrey Davis
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Kane Lai
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Landon Voigt
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dean Schafer + Bob Keith4349% gamesnot enough data
Jeffrey Davis + Andrew Smolenski134 matchesnot enough data
Jon Szumny + Alexander Slowatek213 matchesnot enough data
Jon Szumny + Dean Schafer213 matchesnot enough data
Dean Schafer + Hoang Nguyen213 matchesnot enough data
Dean Schafer + Andrew Smolenski123 matchesnot enough data
Hoang Nguyen + Andrew Smolenski123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Hoang Nguyen
10W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%77%22%
3.89
4
Alexander Slowatek
9W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Dean Schafer
68W–43L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Bob Keith
23W–29L career · 4 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Jon Szumny
10W–11L career · no lines in 2025
26%73%<1%
3.59
3.5
Andrew Smolenski
13W–17L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%32%68%
3.57
James Shaw
8W–28L career · 3 lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
3.49
Jeffrey Davis
12W–22L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.25
Kane Lai
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Landon Voigt
4W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.