Teams

Millers/55s/3.0/FAC

2025 Man · Cov Mixed 55 & Over

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Cov Mixed 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.62 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Allison Harrison
published 3
2.66
Diane Satter
usually #1 Doubles 54%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published 3
2.62
Adam Scarbrough
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.59
Jody Harper
usually #3 Doubles 32%, also #2 Doubles 26% · published
Alfred Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Fran Dominique
usually #3 Doubles 48%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
Gail Miller
usually #1 Doubles 61%, also #3 Doubles 28% · published
Jane Bearden
published
Kim Kocken
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
Mark Glassett
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 42% · published
Ricky Bearden
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Rita Rebouche
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Robert Barrosse
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
SHELLY GALLARDO
usually #2 Doubles 45%, also #3 Doubles 45% · published
Susan Bullock
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 28% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

SHELLY GALLARDO + Rita Rebouche2539% gamesnot enough data
Fran Dominique + Robert Barrosse5157% gamesnot enough data
Gail Miller + Diane Satter1440% gamesnot enough data
Adam Scarbrough + Mark Glassett1438% gamesnot enough data
Robert Barrosse + SHELLY GALLARDO134 matchesnot enough data
Gail Miller + Kim Kocken123 matchesnot enough data
Kim Kocken + Mark Glassett213 matchesnot enough data
Adam Scarbrough + Jody Harper123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Allison Harrison
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Diane Satter
10W–27L career · 26 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.66
3
Adam Scarbrough
11W–29L career · 15 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
2.62
Jody Harper
10W–36L career · 18 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
2.59
Alfred Johnson
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Fran Dominique
27W–26L career · 31 lines in 2025
not enough data
Gail Miller
24W–34L career · 36 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jane Bearden
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kim Kocken
37W–25L career · 37 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mark Glassett
13W–35L career · 26 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ricky Bearden
5W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rita Rebouche
12W–23L career · 12 lines in 2025
not enough data
Robert Barrosse
10W–12L career · 11 lines in 2025
not enough data
SHELLY GALLARDO
12W–49L career · 20 lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Bullock
17W–41L career · 18 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.