Teams

Aged to Perfection- Pongsugree

2025 Shenandoah Adult 55 & Over · Shenandoah Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.89 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-03-06vs Over the Net- SmithWon 20
W#2 DoublesTerry Cocozza / Brenda Clark vs Jacquelyn Worman / Tina Woods6-3, 3-5
W#3 DoublesCarisa Dueweke / Susan Spector vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-02-27vs Over the Net- SmithLost 02
L#1 DoublesCheryl Danner / Gina Ryan vs Jennifer East / Carolyn Greis3-6, 5-6
L#2 DoublesCarisa Dueweke / Jessica Egenrieder vs Jill Poretz / Tina Woods4-6, 0-6
2025-02-20vs Over the Net- SmithWon 10
W#3 DoublesTerry Cocozza / Gina Ryan vs Eve Weber / Susan Lombardi6-2, 5-5
2025-02-13vs Over the Net- SmithSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTerry Cocozza / Brenda Clark vs Carolyn Greis / Kay Bransford3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTracey White / Carisa Dueweke vs Susan Lombardi / Tina Woods6-7, 3-2
2025-02-06vs Over the Net- SmithSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCatherine Mitchell / Cheryl Danner vs Jennifer East / Kay Bransford3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesLisa Wolff / Susan Spector vs Kathleen Eickelberg / Susan Lombardi1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-01-30vs Over the Net- SmithWon 20
W#1 DoublesTracey White / Margaret Sita vs Eve Weber / Jill Poretz6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCheryl Danner / Susan Spector vs Kathleen Eickelberg / Tina Woods6-3, 4-4
2025-01-23vs Over the Net- SmithWon 30
W#1 DoublesTerry Cocozza / Catherine Mitchell vs Jennifer East / Jeanne Baily7-6, 2-1
W#2 DoublesJessica Egenrieder / Lisa Wolff vs Kathleen Eickelberg / Jenelle Langen6-2, 3-3
W#3 DoublesMargaret Sita / Carisa Dueweke vs Tina Woods / Carolyn Greis6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Shenandoah Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Beth Kaufman
published 4
3.83
Margaret Sita
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.71
Gina Ryan
published 4
3.68
Jessica Egenrieder
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
Tracey White
published
3.53
Susan Spector
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.42
Terry Cocozza
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.40
Lisa Wolff
published
3.38
Cheryl Danner
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.32
Brenda Clark
published 4
3.25
Carisa Dueweke
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.12
Ursula Cox
published
Vanessa Ogilvie
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jessica Egenrieder + Cheryl Danner314 matchesnot enough data
Jessica Egenrieder + Susan Spector134 matchesnot enough data
Cheryl Danner + Terry Cocozza044 matchesnot enough data
Susan Spector + Terry Cocozza224 matchesnot enough data
Jessica Egenrieder + Carisa Dueweke033 matchesnot enough data
Cheryl Danner + Susan Spector123 matchesnot enough data
Gina Ryan + Terry Cocozza123 matchesnot enough data
Susan Spector + Carisa Dueweke123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Beth Kaufman
42W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
4.02
4
Margaret Sita
100W–41L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Gina Ryan
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Jessica Egenrieder
163W–169L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.68
Tracey White
7W–9L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.60
4
Susan Spector
321W–248L career · 3 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.53
3.5
Terry Cocozza
230W–349L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
Lisa Wolff
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
79%21%<1%
3.40
3.5
Cheryl Danner
137W–193L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.38
4
Brenda Clark
18W–27L career · no lines in 2025
91%9%<1%
3.32
4
Carisa Dueweke
74W–148L career · type A · 8 lines in 2025
98%2%<1%
3.25
Ursula Cox
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.12
Vanessa Ogilvie
5W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.