Teams

Seminole Lakes - Mayer

2026 LeeCharlotte Combo 50 & Over Summer · 7.5 W

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-08-31vs UTC - ShotwellLost 12
L#1 DoublesDiane Crews / Cheryl Domingo vs Michelle Koeppel / Kim Shotwell7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJanet Kramer / Deanna Williams vs Katina Colbert / Amy Daltrui3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPetra Klos / Karen Corliss vs Patricia Duquette / Pamella Attuso6-3, 6-4
2026-08-24vs Colonial CC - DunbarWon 30
W#1 DoublesJanet Kramer / Deanna Williams vs Beth Schomp / Lori Roberts6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCheryl Domingo / Diane Crews vs Christine Brodsky / Kim McCartney6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesPetra Klos / Julie Schoettley vs Ginny Asgeirsson / Leigh Lewis7-5, 6-2
2026-08-17vs Courts at Cape Coral - RiccioWon 20
W#1 DoublesJanet Kramer / Deanna Williams vs Sue Savage / Cathrin Matzen6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDiane Crews / Teresa Mayer vs Val Pacenta / Heather Humann3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-08-10vs UTC - ShotwellLost 12
W#1 DoublesJanet Kramer / Deanna Williams vs Michelle Koeppel / Andre Margaux6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesPetra Klos / Karen Corliss vs Katina Colbert / Kim Shotwell1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLori Vivian / Heidi Balter vs Christy Smith / Pamella Attuso2-6, 5-7
2026-08-03vs Colonial CC - DunbarWon 30
W#1 DoublesCheryl Domingo / Janet Kramer vs Karen Dunbar / Karen Moss6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKaren Corliss / Petra Klos vs Shelley Marcus / Beth Schomp6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJulie Schoettley / Heidi Balter vs Christine Brodsky / Ginny Asgeirsson6-2, 6-3
2026-08-01vs UTC - ShotwellLost 12
W#1 DoublesLori Vivian / Julie Schoettley vs Patricia Duquette / Andre Margaux6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJanet Kramer / Cheryl Domingo vs Michelle Koeppel / Kim Shotwell1-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesPetra Klos / Teresa Mayer vs Katina Colbert / Ann Boyd3-6, 2-6
2026-07-27vs Courts at Cape Coral - RiccioWon 21
L#1 DoublesKaren Corliss / Lori Vivian vs Sue Savage / Karen Regan2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesHeidi Balter / Julie Schoettley vs Cathrin Matzen / Val Pacenta6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesDeanna Williams / Janet Kramer vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-07-13vs Colonial CC - DunbarWon 30
W#1 DoublesKaren Corliss / Petra Klos vs Tricia Blakeslee / Lori Roberts7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCheryl Domingo / Janet Kramer vs Kimberly Harrsch / Shelley Marcus6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTeresa Mayer / Deanna Williams vs Ginny Asgeirsson / Beth Schomp3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-07-06vs Courts at Cape Coral - RiccioWon 21
W#1 DoublesJanet Kramer / Lori Vivian vs Heather Humann / Anne Niederkorn6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesPetra Klos / Teresa Mayer vs Sue Savage / Kendra Rowe6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJulie Schoettley / Cheryl Domingo vs Susan Duncan / Val Pacenta7-6, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 7.5 W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1UTC - Shotwell6115614157
2Seminole Lakes - Mayer5215616154
3Colonial CC - Dunbar1641734210

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Diane Crews
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.31
Cheryl Domingo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.95
Heidi Balter
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Janet Kramer
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Julie Schoettley
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Karen Corliss
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Lori Vivian
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Petra Klos
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
Teresa Mayer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Petra Klos + Karen Corliss314 matchesnot enough data
Petra Klos + Teresa Mayer213 matchesnot enough data
Janet Kramer + Cheryl Domingo213 matchesnot enough data
Cheryl Domingo + Julie Schoettley123 matchesnot enough data
Cheryl Domingo + Diane Crews123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Diane Crews
6W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
3.79
3.5
Cheryl Domingo
104W–57L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.31
3
Heidi Balter
16W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
Janet Kramer
20W–14L career · 9 lines in 2026
not enough data
Julie Schoettley
28W–25L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Karen Corliss
5W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lori Vivian
12W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Petra Klos
23W–31L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data
Teresa Mayer
4W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.