Teams

Colonial CC - Dunbar

2026 LeeCharlotte Combo 50 & Over Summer · 7.5 W

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-08-31vs Courts at Cape Coral - RiccioLost 02
L#1 DoublesKimberly Harrsch / Christine Brodsky vs Amy Marinell / Karen Regan1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Moss / Leigh Lewis vs Heather Humann / Val Pacenta4-6, 4-6
2026-08-24vs Seminole Lakes - MayerLost 03
L#1 DoublesBeth Schomp / Lori Roberts vs Janet Kramer / Deanna Williams3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesChristine Brodsky / Kim McCartney vs Cheryl Domingo / Diane Crews3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesGinny Asgeirsson / Leigh Lewis vs Petra Klos / Julie Schoettley5-7, 2-6
2026-08-17vs UTC - ShotwellLost 03
L#1 DoublesKaren Moss / Kimberly Harrsch vs Patricia Duquette / Jane Zito4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLori Roberts / Beth Schomp vs Ana Monahan / Andre Margaux5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesGinny Asgeirsson / Leigh Lewis vs Cynthia Sabatino / Sheila Snow-Martineau4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-08-10vs Courts at Cape Coral - RiccioLost 12
L#1 DoublesTricia Blakeslee / Lori Roberts vs Heather Humann / Amy Marinell6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesShelley Marcus / Kim McCartney vs Cathrin Matzen / Val Pacenta6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKaren Moss / Karen Dunbar vs Susan Duncan / Janele Hyer-Spencer6-0, 6-3
2026-08-03vs Seminole Lakes - MayerLost 03
L#1 DoublesKaren Dunbar / Karen Moss vs Cheryl Domingo / Janet Kramer3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesShelley Marcus / Beth Schomp vs Karen Corliss / Petra Klos2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesChristine Brodsky / Ginny Asgeirsson vs Julie Schoettley / Heidi Balter2-6, 3-6
2026-07-27vs UTC - ShotwellLost 03
L#1 DoublesTricia Blakeslee / Beth Schomp vs Katina Colbert / Jane Zito3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Moss / Karen Dunbar vs Amy Daltrui / Christy Smith0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesGinny Asgeirsson / Shelley Marcus vs Andre Margaux / Ana Monahan2-6, 0-6
2026-07-22vs Courts at Cape Coral - RiccioLost 03
L#1 DoublesKaren Moss / Kimberly Harrsch vs Karen Regan / Susan Duncan6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesShelley Marcus / Beth Schomp vs Heather Humann / Val Pacenta3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesGinny Asgeirsson / Karen Dunbar vs Robin Riccio / Monica Adams5-7, 1-6
2026-07-13vs Seminole Lakes - MayerLost 03
L#1 DoublesTricia Blakeslee / Lori Roberts vs Karen Corliss / Petra Klos5-7, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKimberly Harrsch / Shelley Marcus vs Cheryl Domingo / Janet Kramer2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesGinny Asgeirsson / Beth Schomp vs Teresa Mayer / Deanna Williams6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2026-07-06vs UTC - ShotwellWon 30
W#1 DoublesKaren Moss / Kimberly Harrsch vs Michelle Koeppel / Sheila Snow-Martineau6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKim McCartney / Shelley Marcus vs Christy Smith / Kim Shotwell7-5
W#3 DoublesKaren Dunbar / Beth Schomp vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 7.5 W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1UTC - Shotwell6115614157
2Seminole Lakes - Mayer5215616154
3Colonial CC - Dunbar1641734210

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Shelley Marcus
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.19
Ginny Asgeirsson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Karen Moss
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.16
Beth Schomp
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.11
Christine Brodsky
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.11
Leigh Lewis
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.93
Lori Roberts
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Karen Dunbar
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Kim McCartney
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kimberly Harrsch
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Tricia Blakeslee
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shelley Marcus + Karen Moss3443% games−1.3% vs expected
Shelley Marcus + Kim McCartney6252% gamesnot enough data
Karen Dunbar + Christine Brodsky2343% gamesnot enough data
Karen Dunbar + Karen Moss123 matchesnot enough data
Karen Moss + Kimberly Harrsch123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shelley Marcus
30W–24L career · 6 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Ginny Asgeirsson
7W–16L career · 6 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.19
Karen Moss
13W–20L career · 7 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Beth Schomp
1W–7L career · 6 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Christine Brodsky
23W–54L career · 3 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.11
Leigh Lewis
0W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.11
Lori Roberts
3W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
2.93
Karen Dunbar
38W–76L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kim McCartney
29W–37L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kimberly Harrsch
6W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Tricia Blakeslee
24W–90L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.