Teams

Ap.Lyon55A

2025 Capital Adult 55 & Over · 3.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.15 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-04-29vs Be.Simmons55ALost 12
L#1 DoublesBarbra Wait / Rita Burgess vs Pamela Schoenfeld / Stacie White1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSandy Willey / Jennifer Hall vs Bernice Simmons / Nicole Bye5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAnne Boney / Shirley Chapman vs Penny Kraft / Michelle Mills7-6, 6-7, 1-0
2025-04-22vs Je.Komes55A3.5Split 11
L#2 DoublesAnne Boney / Cheryl Kata vs Joanne Kearney / Kimberly Latzy0-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJennifer Hall / Sandy Willey vs Cheryl Smyth / Wendy Sielaty6-1, 6-4
2025-04-16vs Be.Simmons55AWon 20
W#2 DoublesAnne Boney / Cheryl Kata vs Bernice Simmons / Hanna Sturgis6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesShirley Chapman / Cecilia Edgar vs Nicole Bye / Penny Kraft6-2, 6-4
2025-04-15vs St.Grose55ALost 12
L#1 DoublesCheryl Kata / Anne Boney vs Sheila Breckenridge / Jennifer Troch6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSusan Hackman / Jennifer Hall vs Jill David / Stacy Grose3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesApril Lyon / Rita Burgess vs Linda Carroll / LaDonna Lee6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2025-04-08vs Ke.Williams55ASplit 11
W#1 DoublesAnne Boney / Shirley Chapman vs Dara Haney / Beth Robertson6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesCheryl Kata / Denise Lange vs Anne Mueller / Susan Wilkerson6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2025-04-01vs Ki.Lamb55A3.5Split 11
W#2 DoublesAnne Boney / Sandy Willey vs Michele Storr / Mary Tulenko3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCecilia Edgar / Barbra Wait vs Holly Atkinson / Jo Ann Novak3-6, 3-6
2025-03-18vs Je.Komes55A3.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesKelli Harris / Susan Hackman vs CARLA FIELDS / Lisa Carley2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSandy Willey / Cheryl Kata vs Joanne Kearney / Kimberly Latzy2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesLee Berrios-Smothers / April Lyon vs Linda Chabinsky / Cheryl Smyth1-6, 4-6
2025-03-17vs Ke.Williams55ALost 12
L#1 DoublesSusan Hackman / Sandy Willey vs Beth Robertson / Dara Haney6-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesShirley Chapman / Anne Boney vs Christine Bass / Diana Kennedy6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesCheryl Kata / Rita Burgess vs Anne Mueller / Kelli Williams1-6, 0-6
2025-03-11vs St.Grose55ASplit 11
L#1 DoublesShirley Chapman / Anne Boney vs Karen Hepp / Sheila Breckenridge6-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesDenise Lange / Cheryl Kata vs Laura Beaver / Dorothy Nance6-1, 7-6
2025-03-09vs Ki.Lamb55A3.5Won 21
W#1 DoublesSandy Willey / Kelli Harris vs Stephanie Lee / Jorgelina Stroud6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSusan Hackman / Rita Burgess vs Jo Ann Novak / Kimberly Lamb6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLee Berrios-Smothers / Jennifer Hall vs Michele Storr / Holly Atkinson1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.18
Kelli Harris
published
3.13
Anne Boney
published 3.5
3.08
Cheryl Kata
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.04
Susan Hackman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.97
Sandy Willey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.89
Lee Berrios-Smothers
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.88
Rita Burgess
published
2.83
Shirley Chapman
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.76
Barbra Wait
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.71
Cecilia Edgar
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.67
Denise Lange
published 3
2.65
April Lyon
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lee Berrios-Smothers + Barbra Wait3840% gamesnot enough data
Shirley Chapman + Cheryl Kata4454% gamesnot enough data
Lee Berrios-Smothers + April Lyon1545% gamesnot enough data
Shirley Chapman + Lee Berrios-Smothers123 matchesnot enough data
Susan Hackman + Lee Berrios-Smothers123 matchesnot enough data
Susan Hackman + April Lyon123 matchesnot enough data
Cheryl Kata + April Lyon213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelli Harris
40W–37L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Anne Boney
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
15%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Cheryl Kata
132W–83L career · 7 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.08
3.5
Susan Hackman
90W–130L career · 4 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.04
3
Sandy Willey
25W–36L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Lee Berrios-Smothers
78W–108L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.89
Rita Burgess
20W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
2.88
3
Shirley Chapman
139W–74L career · 8 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Barbra Wait
63W–142L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%95%3%
2.76
3
Cecilia Edgar
284W–255L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
2.71
3
Denise Lange
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
10%90%1%
2.67
3
April Lyon
118W–140L career · 5 lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
2.65

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.