Teams

Be.Simmons55A

2025 Capital Adult 55 & Over · 3.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-04-29vs Ap.Lyon55ALost 01
L#3 DoublesPenny Kraft / Michelle Mills vs Anne Boney / Shirley Chapman6-7, 7-6, 0-1
2025-04-28vs St.Grose55AWon 10
W#3 DoublesMichelle Mills / Holly Eisenhour vs Lisa Humphries / Dorothy Nance6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-04-16vs Ap.Lyon55ALost 02
L#2 DoublesBernice Simmons / Hanna Sturgis vs Anne Boney / Cheryl Kata2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesNicole Bye / Penny Kraft vs Shirley Chapman / Cecilia Edgar2-6, 4-6
2025-04-15vs Ki.Lamb55A3.5Lost 01
L#3 DoublesPenny Kraft / Carol Fielitz vs Jeanne Russell / Jennifer Tun0-6, 3-6
2025-04-14vs Ke.Williams55ASplit 11
W#1 DoublesHolly Eisenhour / Michelle Mills vs Catherine Chavez / Perry LeGaux5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBernice Simmons / Penny Kraft vs Dara Haney / Beth Robertson2-6, 1-6
2025-04-08vs Je.Komes55A3.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesPenny Kraft / Nicole Bye vs Ange Urlaub / Joanne Kearney4-6, 4-6
2025-03-18vs St.Grose55ALost 01
L#2 DoublesPenny Kraft / Nicole Bye vs Sheila Breckenridge / Karen Hepp1-6, 1-6
2025-03-11vs Ki.Lamb55A3.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesPenny Kraft / Nicole Bye vs Jessie Brinkley / Jorgelina Stroud3-6, 3-6
2025-03-08vs Ke.Williams55ASplit 11
W#2 DoublesBernice Simmons / Penny Kraft vs Perry LeGaux / Kelleigh Russo6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesVanessa Manuel / Holly Eisenhour vs Christine Bass / Kelli Williams2-6, 1-6
2025-03-04vs Je.Komes55A3.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesBernice Simmons / Hanna Sturgis vs Lisa Carley / Ange Urlaub4-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Stacie White
published
3.28
Pamela Schoenfeld
published
3.03
Michelle Mills
published
2.98
Hanna Sturgis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.67
Penny Kraft
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.66
Holly Eisenhour
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.64
Carol Fielitz
published 3
2.63
Vanessa Manuel
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stacie White
19W–19L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
Pamela Schoenfeld
9W–6L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Michelle Mills
16W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.03
3
Hanna Sturgis
81W–64L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
2.98
3
Penny Kraft
120W–326L career · 8 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Holly Eisenhour
59W–71L career · 3 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.66
3
Carol Fielitz
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%1%
2.64
Vanessa Manuel
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
2.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.