Teams

OLYMPIC 18MX9.0A

2024 MIXED 18&Over · 18&Over MX9.0

27 players · average NTRP 4.79 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 18&Over MX9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.27 estimated across 21 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.91
4.89
Arjith Jayaraman
published 5
4.83
Paul Giraud
published
4.81
David Orces
published 5
4.76
Oliver Kendall
published
4.72
Alisa Yee
published 5
4.56
Jesse Levitin
published
4.33
Kellie Taylor
published
4.25
Clare Badaracco
published 4.5
4.16
Allison Watts
published 4.5
4.16
Caitlin Beatty
published 4.5
4.10
Victoria Watts
published
4.04
Patrick Dwyer
published
4.03
Valerie Pietrasz
published
4.01
Lisa Lohre
published
3.99
Karla Lovett
published
3.97
Katherine McCracken
published
3.93
Jeffrey Curtiss
published
3.90
William Leonard
published
3.78
Joe Gulash
published
3.45
Elizabeth Griffiths
published
Julie Christy
published
Karen MacK
published
Kayla Emmerson
published
Nicole Wedlake
published
Sai Madhavan
published
Sam Stone
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Alexander Brenner
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.91
5
Arjith Jayaraman
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.89
Paul Giraud
8W–4L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.83
5
David Orces
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.81
Oliver Kendall
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.76
5
Alisa Yee
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.72
Jesse Levitin
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.56
Kellie Taylor
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
4.33
4.5
Clare Badaracco
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
4.25
4.5
Allison Watts
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%1%
4.16
4.5
Caitlin Beatty
13W–7L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
4.16
Victoria Watts
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
4.10
Patrick Dwyer
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.04
Valerie Pietrasz
10W–7L career · no lines in 2024
41%59%<1%
4.03
Lisa Lohre
9W–10L career · no lines in 2024
46%54%<1%
4.01
Karla Lovett
0W–9L career · no lines in 2024
54%46%<1%
3.99
Katherine McCracken
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
59%41%<1%
3.97
Jeffrey Curtiss
6W–11L career · no lines in 2024
70%30%<1%
3.93
William Leonard
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
3.90
Joe Gulash
15W–8L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
Elizabeth Griffiths
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
3.45
Julie Christy
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Karen MacK
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kayla Emmerson
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Nicole Wedlake
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sai Madhavan
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sam Stone
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.