Teams

MARIN TC 18AM4.0B

2025 ADULT 18&Over · Men's 4.0

19 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-06-07Won 10
W#1 SinglesNick Stiritz vs Luke McKinlay6-4, 6-3
2025-06-03vs GOLDMAN TC 18AM4.0DLost 01
L#1 SinglesNick Stiritz vs Ed Korenman0-6, 2-6
2025-05-31vs LAGUNITAS CC 18AM4.0ALost 01
L#1 SinglesNick Stiritz vs Robert Cahill1-6, 2-6
2025-04-28Won 10
W#2 SinglesNick Stiritz vs Luke McKinlay6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Ethan Dornhelm
published
3.79
Ben Hock
published 4
3.71
Nick Stiritz
usually #1 Singles 70%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.64
John Honey
published
3.62
Tassos Papadimos
published
3.60
Matt Dveirin
published
3.48
Vladimir Matyurin
published
3.47
Doke Kim
published
3.44
Igor Scherba
published
3.41
Nicolas Pommier
published
3.39
Jeff Loebbaka
published
3.37
Joseph Gil
published
3.32
Erik del Toro
published
3.28
James Busterud
published
3.25
Mark Clem
published
3.20
Jack Kennedy
published
2.98
Patrick Wong
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
PATRICK WHITGROVE
published
Seth Barad
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tassos Papadimos + Igor Scherba303 matchesnot enough data
Erik del Toro + Jack Kennedy123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ethan Dornhelm
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Ben Hock
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Nick Stiritz
30W–23L career · type A · 10 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
John Honey
17W–7L career · no lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.64
Tassos Papadimos
12W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.62
Matt Dveirin
14W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%23%77%
3.60
Vladimir Matyurin
7W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.48
Doke Kim
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
3.47
Igor Scherba
17W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.44
Nicolas Pommier
8W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.41
Jeff Loebbaka
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
Joseph Gil
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.37
Erik del Toro
3W–13L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
James Busterud
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Mark Clem
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Jack Kennedy
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Patrick Wong
10W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
55%45%<1%
2.98
PATRICK WHITGROVE
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
72%28%<1%
2.92
Seth Barad
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.