Teams

Ki.Lamb55S

2023 Cap 55 & Over Singles League · 3.0 Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-21vs Ke.Zargo55SWon 21
W#1 SinglesHolly Atkinson vs Cheryl Kata2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 SinglesJo Ann Novak vs Alisa Miller6-4, 6-1
L#3 SinglesTina Goertz vs Sharon Kucyk1-5
2023-07-19vs We.Sielaty55SWon 20
W#1 SinglesHolly Atkinson vs Jade Paunovich6-0, 6-2
W#3 SinglesJo Ann Novak vs Dawn Rusnak6-1, 6-1
2023-06-30vs Ke.Zargo55SLost 02
L#1 SinglesHolly Atkinson vs Cheryl Kata3-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesTina Goertz vs Kelly Zargo0-6, 2-6
2023-06-16vs We.Sielaty55SSplit 11
L#2 SinglesTina Goertz vs Jade Paunovich0-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesJo Ann Novak vs Marie Gelston6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2023-06-09vs Ke.Zargo55SSplit 11
W#1 SinglesHolly Atkinson vs Ann Garey6-4, 6-3
L#2 SinglesJo Ann Novak vs Cheryl Kata2-6, 0-6
2023-05-26vs We.Sielaty55SWon 21
W#1 SinglesHolly Atkinson vs Wendy Sielaty6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesJo Ann Novak vs Jill Salstrand7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesTina Goertz vs Dawn Rusnak1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.11
Holly Atkinson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Jo Ann Novak
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 40% · published 3
2.83
Kimberly Lamb
published
2.62
Vanessa Manuel
published
2.35
Tina Goertz
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jo Ann Novak + Holly Atkinson8264% games+3.5% vs expected
Tina Goertz + Holly Atkinson7849% games+2.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Holly Atkinson
253W–179L career · 5 lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.11
3
Jo Ann Novak
138W–121L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%30%70%
3.07
Kimberly Lamb
4W–9L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
2.83
Vanessa Manuel
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
2.62
2.5
Tina Goertz
83W–199L career · 4 lines in 2023
0%87%13%
2.35

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.