Teams

We.Sielaty55S

2023 Cap 55 & Over Singles League · 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-07-19vs Ki.Lamb55SLost 03
L#1 SinglesJade Paunovich vs Holly Atkinson0-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesMarie Gelston vs Vanessa Manuel4-6, 5-7
L#3 SinglesDawn Rusnak vs Jo Ann Novak1-6, 1-6
2023-07-14vs Ke.Zargo55SLost 03
L#1 SinglesJill Salstrand vs Ann Garey5-7, 5-7
L#2 SinglesLinda Chabinsky vs Alisa Miller2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 SinglesWendy Sielaty vs Michelle Mills2-6, 3-6
2023-06-16vs Ki.Lamb55SLost 12
L#1 SinglesLinda Chabinsky vs Vanessa Manuel7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesJade Paunovich vs Tina Goertz6-0, 6-2
L#3 SinglesMarie Gelston vs Jo Ann Novak6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2023-05-26vs Ki.Lamb55SLost 12
L#1 SinglesWendy Sielaty vs Holly Atkinson2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesJill Salstrand vs Jo Ann Novak5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 SinglesDawn Rusnak vs Tina Goertz6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Linda Chabinsky
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.95
Marie Gelston
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.87
Jill Salstrand
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.87
Julie Shuey
published
2.78
Wendy Sielaty
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3
2.73
Teri O'Neill
published
2.71
Jade Paunovich
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.54
Dawn Rusnak
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wendy Sielaty + Marie Gelston272450% games+0.9% vs expected
Julie Shuey + Jade Paunovich1740% games−3.6% vs expected
Jill Salstrand + Marie Gelston8257% games−4.5% vs expected
Dawn Rusnak + Jade Paunovich6549% gamesnot enough data
Wendy Sielaty + Jill Salstrand6260% gamesnot enough data
Linda Chabinsky + Wendy Sielaty4253% gamesnot enough data
Linda Chabinsky + Jill Salstrand3362% gamesnot enough data
Linda Chabinsky + Marie Gelston404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Linda Chabinsky
28W–38L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%51%49%
3.00
3
Marie Gelston
215W–161L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Jill Salstrand
71W–77L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%84%16%
2.87
Julie Shuey
11W–28L career · no lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
2.87
3
Wendy Sielaty
168W–185L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%94%5%
2.78
Teri O'Neill
5W–1L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Jade Paunovich
85W–180L career · 2 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
2.71
3
Dawn Rusnak
134W–126L career · 2 lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
2.54

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.