Teams

Bertram/Fayetteville/SRC

2025 Adult Singles 40 & Over · 3.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-02-21vs Evans/Fayetteville/FACLost 12
L#1 SinglesBecca Bertram vs Martha Perez5-7, 3-6
W#2 SinglesNatalie Mayer vs Cezanne Garlinghouse6-0, 6-0
L#3 SinglesTia Greaser vs Carolina Gomez3-6, 5-7
2026-02-16vs Paulk/Centerton/INDLost 12
L#1 SinglesBecca Bertram vs Ashley Crouch2-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesCynthia Meullenet vs Angela Paulk4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 SinglesSherry Carpenter vs Carrie Beere1-6, 3-6
2026-02-11vs Geduldig/Rogers/SVCCLost 12
W#1 SinglesTia Greaser vs Samantha Thiede Erickson6-0, 6-2
L#2 SinglesLeigh Verucchi vs Laura Phillips4-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesSherry Carpenter vs Christa Geduldig1-6, 0-6
2025-12-13vs Wallace/Bella Vista/INDWon 30
W#1 SinglesNatalie Mayer vs Annemarie Porter6-0, 6-4
W#2 SinglesTia Greaser vs Natalia Martin6-1, 6-2
W#3 SinglesBecca Bertram vs Sydney Flaig6-3, 6-1
2025-09-25vs Evans/Fayetteville/FACWon 20
W#1 DoublesJamia Weir / Cynthia Meullenet vs Sherry Lux / Carolina Gomez6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesNatalie Mayer / Sherry Carpenter vs Brittany Adair / Cezanne Garlinghouse6-2, 6-1
2025-08-28vs Evans/Fayetteville/FACWon 20
W#1 DoublesPenny Churchill / Sherry Carpenter vs Christy Haggard / Sarah Diebold7-5, 7-5
W#3 DoublesNatalie Mayer / Becca Bertram vs Sherry Lux / Carolina Gomez6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Natalie Mayer
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.89
Becca Bertram
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.74
Cynthia Meullenet
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.71
Tia Greaser
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.66
Sherry Carpenter
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.44
Leigh Verucchi
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cynthia Meullenet + Becca Bertram134 matchesnot enough data
Sherry Carpenter + Leigh Verucchi134 matchesnot enough data
Cynthia Meullenet + Leigh Verucchi033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Natalie Mayer
38W–14L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.45
3
Becca Bertram
27W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.89
3
Cynthia Meullenet
28W–37L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
Tia Greaser
17W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
Sherry Carpenter
14W–30L career · 4 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
2.66
Leigh Verucchi
3W–34L career · 1 line in 2025
67%33%<1%
2.44

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.