Teams

1PEACH-MAZUR Team Singles 3.5 Women SEM F2

2023 SEM WINTER TEAM SINGLES · 2023 WOMEN 3.5 WINTER SINGLES SEM

8 players · average NTRP 3.40 / S.E. MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
L#1 SinglesMichelle Mazur vs Riya Cao5-7, 1-3
W#2 SinglesElizabeth Mazurco vs Huiping Chen7-5, 3-4
L#3 SinglesJennifer Talbot vs Merrilee Nay1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesMichelle Mazur vs Rebecca Barry6-4, 5-4
L#2 SinglesJude Dokianos vs Dominika Ronikier-Rangi0-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesHeidi Maglicic vs Jennifer Prohow1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMichelle Mazur vs Jodi Jennett6-3, 4-5
L#2 SinglesElizabeth Mazurco vs Susan Joseph1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 SinglesLesley Discher vs Meredith Tyack3-6, 4-2
L#1 SinglesMichelle Mazur vs Elizabeth Mosher3-6, 4-3
W#2 SinglesElizabeth Mazurco vs Maria Gauchey6-0, 6-4
L#3 SinglesJude Dokianos vs Lori Woods2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesMichelle Mazur vs Cindy Cole3-6, 2-5
L#2 SinglesHeidi Maglicic vs Aubrey Casey1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 SinglesJude Dokianos vs Maya Zayat0-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesMichelle Mazur vs Lee Benson6-4, 2-3
L#2 SinglesElizabeth Mazurco vs Katherine Noser7-6, 0-2
L#3 SinglesJude Dokianos vs Julie Webb1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesMichelle Mazur vs Dawn Clegg6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesLesley Discher vs Dominika Ronikier-Rangi4-6, 2-3
W#3 SinglesElizabeth Mazurco vs Jennifer Costabile6-4, 4-0
W#1 SinglesMichelle Mazur vs Leslie Schneemann3-3
L#2 SinglesElizabeth Mazurco vs Margaret Mowbray5-7, 1-0
L#3 SinglesJennifer Talbot vs Melissa Klimkowski0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesKristy Doherty vs Cita Greve6-7
W#2 SinglesElizabeth Mazurco vs Laura Zapytowski6-3, 6-2
W#3 SinglesFran Masters vs Amy Endres6-7, 2-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMichelle Mazur vs Katherine Noser6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesElizabeth Mazurco vs Agnieszka Palarz7-5, 4-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · 2023 WOMEN 3.5 WINTER SINGLES SEM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
14LIB-MARLEY Team Singles 3.5 Women SEM F17120410124
22LIFE-LAMAR Team Singles 3.5 Women SEM F272171023209
34SCWB-CHEN Team Singles 3.5 Women SEM F263151225208
46BRC-SCOTT Team Singles 3.5 Women SEM F263131427217
53LIB-OBRIEN Team Singles 3.5 Women SEM F153141023180
62HV-KRUMMEL Team Singles 3.5 Women SEM F144121227203
75CHIP-CLIFF Team Singles 3.5 Women SEM F13571731214
83DEER-JOSEPH Team Singles 3.5 Women SEM F236121536233
91PEACH-MAZUR Team Singles 3.5 Women SEM F227121529210
105BRC-NOVOTNY Team Singles 3.5 Women SEM F2146918118
111LIB-HAESSLER Team Singles 3.5 Women SEM F11771730205

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Michelle Mazur
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Kristy Doherty
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Elizabeth Mazurco
usually #2 Singles 88%, also #3 Singles 13% · published 3.5
3.10
Jennifer Talbot
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.10
Lesley Discher
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3.5
2.71
Heidi Maglicic
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3
Fran Masters
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Jude Dokianos
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heidi Maglicic + Fran Masters1546% games−3.4% vs expected
Michelle Mazur + Heidi Maglicic2643% games−5.9% vs expected
Heidi Maglicic + Elizabeth Mazurco314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Michelle Mazur
147W–165L career · 9 lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Kristy Doherty
77W–74L career · 1 line in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Elizabeth Mazurco
86W–51L career · 8 lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.24
Jennifer Talbot
17W–34L career · 2 lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.10
3.5
Lesley Discher
53W–64L career · 2 lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.10
3
Heidi Maglicic
76W–119L career · 2 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
2.71
Fran Masters
7W–30L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Jude Dokianos
31W–62L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.