Teams

Marco YMCA - Washak

2021 Collier Combo 18 & Over Spring · 7.5 Women - Spring

18 players · average NTRP 3.73 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-05-20vs Heritage Bay - BargerLost 02
L#2 DoublesJennifer Ball / Ellen Schmidt vs Gretchen Landolt / Lauren Keillor4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAndrea Washak / Kelly Heintzelman vs Karen Hole / Shelley Boggess4-6, 2-6
2021-05-19vs Quail West - C. SeeseWon 21
W#1 DoublesCorey Stranger / Bernadette DiPino vs Tricia Blakeslee / Darina Cammarato7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMia Delk / Gladyvette Benarroch vs Jordan Jaffe / Tracy Leonard3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAndrea Washak / Jennifer Ball vs Christine Seese / Ginny Asgeirsson6-1, 6-2
2021-05-13vs COLLIER - Riverstone - MalletteWon 10
W#3 DoublesBernadette DiPino / Kelly Heintzelman vs Amanda Mallette / Amy Gardner6-3, 6-2
2021-04-29Won 10
W#1 DoublesKelly Heintzelman / Bernadette DiPino vs MacKenzie Rickman / Linda Smith2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-04-22vs COLLIER - Riverstone - MalletteWon 20
W#2 DoublesLynne Huggins / Michelle Kaytaz vs Dayna Webre / Candice Lopez6-0, 7-6
W#3 DoublesStephanie Opel / Jennifer Ball vs Eileen Valerio / Amanda Mallette6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2021-04-15vs Quail West - C. SeeseWon 20
W#1 DoublesKelly Heintzelman / Bernadette DiPino vs Christine Seese / Ginny Asgeirsson6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJennifer Ball / Lori Irvin Hawes vs Channon Champ / Jordan Jaffe6-2, 6-0
2021-04-08vs Heritage Bay - BargerSplit 11
L#2 DoublesAndrea Washak / Carrie Masci vs MacKenzie Rickman / Brenda Shields4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesStephanie Opel / Jennifer Ball vs Brenda Rhoda / Julie Lenhart7-5, 7-5
2021-04-01vs COLLIER - Riverstone - MalletteSplit 11
L#2 DoublesAndrea Washak / Ellen Schmidt vs Dayna Webre / Eileen Valerio0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesStephanie Opel / Jennifer Ball vs Amanda Mallette / Carrie Stowell6-1, 6-2
2021-03-25vs Quail West - C. SeeseLost 01
L#2 DoublesLynne Huggins / Michelle Kaytaz vs Mei-Mei Kirk / Freda Levin2-6, 6-0, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women - Spring have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Bernadette DiPino
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.80
Karen Huffman
published
3.77
Lynne Huggins
published
Carole Flegel
published 4
3.74
Carrie Masci
published 4
3.73
Lori Irvin Hawes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.69
Andrea Washak
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.67
Stephanie Opel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.61
Marianne Khayat
published
3.47
Connie Johnson
published 3.5
3.44
Susan Julich
published
3.41
Ellen Schmidt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.37
Michelle Kaytaz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Mia Delk
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Brita Swanson
published 3.5
3.18
Linda Keely
published
3.16
Corey Stranger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Jennifer Ball
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bernadette DiPino + Andrea Washak471162% games+4.9% vs expected
Andrea Washak + Stephanie Opel82043% games−6.2% vs expected
Corey Stranger + Michelle Kaytaz11551% gamesnot enough data
Corey Stranger + Andrea Washak6454% gamesnot enough data
Andrea Washak + Mia Delk6452% gamesnot enough data
Corey Stranger + Mia Delk4447% gamesnot enough data
Corey Stranger + Stephanie Opel4352% gamesnot enough data
Ellen Schmidt + Stephanie Opel3352% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bernadette DiPino
318W–110L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%78%22%
3.90
Karen Huffman
12W–20L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.80
Lynne Huggins
12W–6L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Carole Flegel
5W–7L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Carrie Masci
21W–8L career · type S · no lines in 2021
3%95%2%
3.74
Lori Irvin Hawes
128W–74L career · 1 line in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Andrea Washak
352W–306L career · 4 lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Stephanie Opel
192W–136L career · 3 lines in 2021
10%90%1%
3.67
Marianne Khayat
4W–4L career · no lines in 2021
20%80%<1%
3.61
3.5
Connie Johnson
16W–8L career · no lines in 2021
<1%60%40%
3.47
Susan Julich
26W–18L career · no lines in 2021
<1%69%31%
3.44
3.5
Ellen Schmidt
115W–89L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Michelle Kaytaz
127W–97L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%85%15%
3.37
3.5
Mia Delk
270W–304L career · 1 line in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Brita Swanson
22W–18L career · no lines in 2021
5%93%1%
3.21
Linda Keely
11W–22L career · no lines in 2021
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Corey Stranger
223W–172L career · 1 line in 2021
11%88%<1%
3.16
Jennifer Ball
19W–13L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.