Teams

Ryane Criswell W7.5

2025 DALLAS TENNIS COMBO DOUBLES Weekend Event · W 7.5

7 players · average NTRP 3.88 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-08-23vs Casey Carlson W7.5Won 21
L#1 DoublesLindsey McDavid / Erika Meade vs Casey Carlson / Kristi Howard6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRyane Criswell / Sarah Wollitz vs Aundi Henderson / Lisa Buitron7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesHolly Friedman / Erika McCann vs Robyn Krivacic / Michelle Coates6-3, 6-2
2025-08-23vs Amanda VanDenBerg W7.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesCherie Smith / Carrie Devries vs Andrea Fuquay / Hilary Dooley6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRyane Criswell / Sarah Wollitz vs Shelly Tompkins / Jennifer Willson7-6, 4-5
W#3 DoublesHolly Friedman / Erika McCann vs Yvette Freeman / Holly Myers6-3, 6-0
2025-08-22vs Rosalyn Luong W7.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesSarah Wollitz / Ryane Criswell vs Winnie Stimmel / Julie Hoang7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCherie Smith / Erika Meade vs Sandy Seaton / Tracy Akbany6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesHolly Friedman / Erika McCann vs Heather Steele Curtis / Natalie Gilbert1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for W 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Sarah Wollitz
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.79
Erika McCann
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.77
Cherie Smith
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.69
Lindsey McDavid
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.66
Ryane Criswell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.46
Erika Meade
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
Carrie Devries
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ryane Criswell + Lindsey McDavid2351% gamesnot enough data
Ryane Criswell + Sarah Wollitz213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Wollitz
35W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.88
4
Erika McCann
25W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Cherie Smith
19W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
Lindsey McDavid
14W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
7%92%1%
3.69
Ryane Criswell
30W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
11%88%<1%
3.66
4
Erika Meade
15W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
3.46
3.5
Carrie Devries
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.