Teams

Amanda VanDenBerg W7.5

2025 DALLAS TENNIS COMBO DOUBLES Weekend Event · W 7.5

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-08-23vs Rosalyn Luong W7.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesYvette Freeman / Heather Evetts vs Winnie Stimmel / Julie Hoang4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAmanda VanDenBerg / Holly Myers vs Lily Tran / Becky Connet6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesShelly Tompkins / Jennifer Willson vs Rosalyn Luong / Kayla Chen7-5, 5-7, 0-1
2025-08-23vs Ryane Criswell W7.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesAndrea Fuquay / Hilary Dooley vs Cherie Smith / Carrie Devries3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesShelly Tompkins / Jennifer Willson vs Ryane Criswell / Sarah Wollitz7-6, 4-5
L#3 DoublesYvette Freeman / Holly Myers vs Holly Friedman / Erika McCann3-6, 0-6
2025-08-22vs Casey Carlson W7.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesAmanda VanDenBerg / Amy Moore vs Lisa Buitron / Aundi Henderson4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesYvette Freeman / Heather Evetts vs Shannon Craig / Michelle Coates6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesAndrea Fuquay / Hilary Dooley vs Kristi Howard / Kerry Schonwald1-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for W 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Amanda VanDenBerg
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.69
Shelly Tompkins
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.56
Andrea Fuquay
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.55
Yvette Freeman
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.46
Jennifer Willson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.41
Heather Evetts
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.34
Hilary Dooley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Yvette Freeman + Amanda VanDenBerg6161% gamesnot enough data
Yvette Freeman + Shelly Tompkins224 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Willson + Shelly Tompkins134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amanda VanDenBerg
34W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
Shelly Tompkins
14W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Andrea Fuquay
4W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.56
Yvette Freeman
29W–34L career · 3 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.55
Jennifer Willson
20W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.46
Heather Evetts
20W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.41
Hilary Dooley
3W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.34

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.