Teams

SDNC 4.0 Lomas Santa Fe CC (3:2)/ Lyle

2023 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SDNC · SDNC - Men - 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.70 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-06-04vs SDNC 4.0 FRCC (3:2)/ HansenWon 10
W#1 DoublesJon Corn / Brian Munce vs Tim Hackett / John Jastremski6-1, 6-4
W#1 DoublesJon Corn / Robert Prendergast vs Donald Carroll / Nathan Adelman5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesScott Hecker / Tim MacH vs Matthew Kessler / Jon Murphy6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2023-04-30vs SDNC 4.0 FRCC (3:2)/ SoderholmLost 01
L#3 DoublesTim MacH / Brad Jacobs vs Todd Bulich / Allison Walters4-6, 6-7
2023-04-23vs SDNC 4.0 RPTC (3:2)/ SeagerLost 02
L#2 DoublesJon Corn / Wolfram Worms vs David Hendren / Rand Smith4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesTim MacH / Jeff Lyle vs Wilson Yongkap Yeem / Derek Bruton3-6, 4-6
2023-04-16vs SDNC 4.0 FRCC (3:2)/ LoewLost 01
L#1 DoublesBrian Munce / Jon Corn vs Russell Silberstein / Vitor Roque1-6, 3-6
2023-04-02Won 10
W#2 DoublesRobert Prendergast / Jon Corn vs David Kulik / Alekso Stankoski6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC - Men - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Brian Munce
published 4
3.80
Jon Corn
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.74
Wolfram Worms
published
3.64
William McGuigan
published
3.63
Keith Greener
published
3.62
Jeff Lyle
published
3.60
Zoltan Hajnal
published
3.46
Tim MacH
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Brad Jacobs
published 3.5
3.26
Alfonso Tumini
published 3.5
Robert Prendergast
published
Walt Tysenn
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brian Munce + Jon Corn5750% games−1.3% vs expected
Brian Munce + Wolfram Worms314 matchesnot enough data
Brian Munce + Robert Prendergast033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brian Munce
8W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%64%36%
3.95
4
Jon Corn
58W–45L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.80
Wolfram Worms
7W–4L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.74
William McGuigan
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%<1%
3.64
Keith Greener
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%<1%
3.63
Jeff Lyle
2W–8L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.62
Zoltan Hajnal
2W–7L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.60
3.5
Tim MacH
10W–36L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Brad Jacobs
2W–10L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.31
3.5
Alfonso Tumini
2W–8L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.26
Robert Prendergast
7W–15L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Walt Tysenn
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.