Teams

2-MJDunnington-UNC-40 3.5

2023 Eno River Singles 40 & Over · Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women Evening

9 players · average NTRP 3.58 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-25vs 1-SBrogden-Eno-40Won 20
W#1 SinglesCathy Joyce vs Berna Tareen6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesMary Jo Dunnington vs Martha Clippinger6-1, 6-1
2023-07-18vs 5-CPeterson-HVCCSplit 11
W#1 SinglesMary Jo Dunnington vs Cecily Peterson6-1, 6-0
L#3 SinglesMarianne Gildea vs Caroline Hamilton2-6, 1-6
2023-07-13vs 3-DSpero-Eno-40 SinglesWon 10
W#1 SinglesCathy Joyce vs Donna Spero6-3, 6-1
2023-06-29vs 4-DAdams-CHTC-SinglesWon 20
W#1 SinglesCathy Joyce vs Andy Blackburn4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMary Jo Dunnington vs Jaime Stein6-1, 6-1
2023-06-28vs 5-CPeterson-HVCCSplit 11
L#1 SinglesAlyse Levine vs Mary Susan Easterling4-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesCathy Joyce vs Gina Goldthwaite6-0, 6-1
2023-06-06vs 1-SBrogden-Eno-40Won 10
W#2 SinglesAlyse Levine vs Claire Little6-0, 7-6
2023-05-23vs 3-DSpero-Eno-40 SinglesSplit 11
W#1 SinglesMary Jo Dunnington vs Erin Reiter6-0, 6-1
L#2 SinglesMarianne Gildea vs Dana Cantrell1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.17
Amy Hoots
published 4
4.04
Cathy Joyce
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.60
Mary Jo Dunnington
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.48
Sophie Brock
published
3.46
Sarah Franks
published
3.37
Alyse Levine
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.16
Marianne Gildea
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.12
Dawn Kleinman
published 3
2.85
Sarah Towles
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amy Hoots
105W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%12%88%
4.17
4
Cathy Joyce
123W–31L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%39%61%
4.04
3.5
Mary Jo Dunnington
255W–118L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%24%76%
3.60
Sophie Brock
6W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%56%44%
3.48
Sarah Franks
52W–31L career · no lines in 2023
<1%61%38%
3.46
3.5
Alyse Levine
31W–38L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
3.37
3.5
Marianne Gildea
22W–44L career · 2 lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.16
3
Dawn Kleinman
18W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%19%81%
3.12
Sarah Towles
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%13%
2.85

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.