Teams

Davis 18s 4.0M Thurs PM

2025 Piedmont USTA 18 & Over · MEN 4.0 18 & Over Thur PM

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-05-13vs Whiteley/Palmer 18s 4.0M Thurs PMWon 31
W#1 SinglesCharles Chuang vs Robert Lough5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLawrence Cox / J Stacey Allred vs David Anderson / Mason Croley3-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesAkira Terui vs Davis Phanthalack7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJohn Rodenbough / Tony McGraw vs John Uselding / Yoichiro Shibata6-4, 6-4
2025-05-01vs Beuchat 18s 4.0M Thurs PMWon 31
W#1 SinglesCharles Chuang vs Scott Cunningham6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLawrence Cox / John Rodenbough vs Brad Green / Chris Apple5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesAkira Terui vs Kwamba Nkembe3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAditya Shrivastava / Wayne Hamilton vs Rodrigo Lara / Aravindh Raj Sankara Narayanan2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-04-03vs Schmidt 18s 4.0M Thurs PMWon 30
W#1 DoublesJohn Graves / Akira Terui vs Peter Cohen / Jesse Chandler6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJohn Rodenbough / Stephen Davis vs Kevin Womble / Bobby Powell6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLawrence Cox / Wayne Hamilton vs Michael Schmidt / Ian Patrick6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 18 & Over Thur PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Charles Chuang
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.86
Akira Terui
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.84
Eric Biesecker
published 4
3.77
Charles Dawson
published 4
3.72
Corey Davis
published 4
3.69
Tony McGraw
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
Jeff Hu
published
3.66
John Rodenbough
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.56
Aditya Shrivastava
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.55
J Stacey Allred
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.54
Lawrence Cox
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Rodenbough + Tony McGraw3253% games−1.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Charles Chuang
37W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.89
4
Akira Terui
15W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Eric Biesecker
17W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%89%11%
3.84
4
Charles Dawson
19W–13L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Corey Davis
47W–22L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.72
Tony McGraw
25W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%1%
3.69
Jeff Hu
9W–9L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.67
John Rodenbough
19W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
11%89%<1%
3.66
4
Aditya Shrivastava
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.56
4
J Stacey Allred
12W–35L career · 4 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.55
Lawrence Cox
15W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.54

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.