Teams

SYR: 40-LOVE

2026 18&Over Mixed · 7.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / WESTERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-02-21vs Nelligan/ GearyWon 10
W#3 DoublesHANSEOK KIM / Alyssa Calenzo vs Mary Kaye / Jonathan Dee6-3, 7-5
2026-02-14vs Krueger-SchiffrikWon 20
W#1 DoublesJonghyun Park / Bella Meade vs Steve Brandt / Molly Ryan6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKarl Offen / McKenna Quinn vs Alexandra Kostakis / Panagiotis Skaltsas6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2026-01-31vs Manlius YMCASplit 11
L#1 DoublesBella Meade / Sungjoon Park vs Michele Kellish / Fenghua Li2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAlyssa Calenzo / Jonghyun Park vs Valerie Clarke / Brendan Reagan2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-01-17vs Nelligan/ GearyWon 10
W#2 DoublesBella Meade / Jonghyun Park vs Anthony Farella / Emily Vacher7-6, 6-1
2025-12-13vs Net PlayWon 10
W#3 DoublesJonghyun Park / Bella Meade vs Rocco Edwards / Erica Haray6-4, 6-0
2025-12-06vs Manlius YMCAWon 10
W#2 DoublesMcKenna Quinn / Jonghyun Park vs Ping Deng / Fenghua Li6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Katelyn Nguyen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.95
Brian Emigholz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
McKenna Quinn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.53
Bong Gee Jang
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.46
Bella Meade
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.42
Jeffrey Friedman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.37
Karl Offen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.36
Eunhee Park
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
HANSEOK KIM
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Ja Youn Kwon
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.11
Kyoungsoo Lee
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Sungjoon Park
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
3.09
Allyson Mead
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.74
Alyssa Calenzo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jonghyun Park
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Lauren Maring
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eunhee Park + Bong Gee Jang7069% gamesnot enough data
Bong Gee Jang + McKenna Quinn4253% gamesnot enough data
Karl Offen + McKenna Quinn404 matchesnot enough data
Kyoungsoo Lee + Sungjoon Park044 matchesnot enough data
Bong Gee Jang + Lauren Maring404 matchesnot enough data
Ja Youn Kwon + HANSEOK KIM303 matchesnot enough data
Bella Meade + Jonghyun Park303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Katelyn Nguyen
85W–57L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
3.96
4
Brian Emigholz
89W–69L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.95
McKenna Quinn
18W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.58
3.5
Bong Gee Jang
57W–32L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%42%58%
3.53
3.5
Bella Meade
13W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
3.46
Jeffrey Friedman
14W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
73%27%<1%
3.42
3.5
Karl Offen
53W–59L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.37
3.5
Eunhee Park
48W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%86%13%
3.36
3.5
HANSEOK KIM
41W–41L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.33
3.5
Ja Youn Kwon
42W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.30
Kyoungsoo Lee
24W–46L career · 8 lines in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
3.11
Sungjoon Park
36W–43L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%21%79%
3.10
3
Allyson Mead
54W–37L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%23%77%
3.09
3
Alyssa Calenzo
27W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%95%2%
2.74
Jonghyun Park
5W–0L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lauren Maring
12W–7L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.