Teams

OSB:Prosecco Girls:Potter/Costello

2021 ECT Adult 18 & Over Women · 3.5 Women 2

14 players · average NTRP 3.58 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2021-03-28vs LS:Dematteo's Diva's:DematteoWon 31
W#1 DoublesBeverly Costello / Susan Potter vs Josie Jordan / Beth Pye6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesAmy Searle vs Anne Luner7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAgnieszka Robinson / Nancy Schumann vs Lisa Belliveau / Jessica Kirwan4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRebecca Coffey / Crystal Cowles vs Kim de Matteo / Sherri Storms6-0, 6-1
2021-03-21vs LS:Dematteo's Diva's:DematteoSplit 22
W#1 DoublesBeverly Costello / Philippa Mannino vs Lisa Belliveau / Debra Chamberlain7-5, 7-5
W#1 SinglesCrystal Cowles vs Anne Luner6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesRebecca Coffey / Susan Potter vs Connie Hurtt / Kate Welch2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesSamantha Fucci / Nancy Schumann vs Josie Jordan / Beth Pye6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2021-03-14vs MIS:Johnson/SteppanWon 40
W#1 DoublesCarolyn Caldwell / Rebecca Coffey vs Dana Johnson / Claire Steppan6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesCrystal Cowles vs Mandy Wong6-2, 4-2
W#2 DoublesBeverly Costello / Svetlana Goletz vs Andrea Frickman / Lisa Marie Coleman5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSusan Potter / Nancy Schumann vs Amy Baumann / Sky Hoyt6-3, 6-3
2021-03-07vs LS:Dematteo's Diva's:DematteoWon 40
W#1 DoublesBeverly Costello / Carolyn Caldwell vs Connie Hurtt / Lisa Belliveau6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAmy Searle vs Lisa Gilbert2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRebecca Coffey / Nancy Schumann vs Josie Jordan / Sarah Steverman6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSusan Potter / Hollis Ridgway vs Jessica Kirwan / Lesley Mahoney7-5, 6-1
2021-02-28vs MIS:Johnson/SteppanWon 31
L#1 DoublesBeverly Costello / Philippa Mannino vs Claire Steppan / Lisa Marie Coleman4-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesAmy Searle vs Mandy Wong6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCarolyn Caldwell / Rebecca Coffey vs Emily Hayes / Andrea Frickman6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSusan Potter / Hollis Ridgway vs Amy Baumann / Courtney Marshall Corkhill7-6, 6-1
2021-02-13vs LS:Dematteo's Diva's:DematteoWon 31
W#1 DoublesBeverly Costello / Philippa Mannino vs Sarah Steverman / Kate Welch6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesAmy Searle vs Beth Pye3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNancy Schumann / Hollis Ridgway vs Josie Jordan / Lesley Mahoney5-7, 6-0, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSvetlana Goletz / Agnieszka Robinson vs Jessica Kirwan / Kim de Matteo6-3, 7-5
2020-11-15vs MIS:Johnson/SteppanWon 31
W#1 DoublesPhilippa Mannino / Carolyn Caldwell vs Emily Hayes / Andrea Frickman6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesSvetlana Goletz vs Mandy Wong6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesSusan Potter / Rebecca Coffey vs Christine Edwards / Susan Demovick6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMary Ann Moran / Hollis Ridgway vs Courtney Marshall Corkhill / Oren Carton2-6, 1-6
2020-10-25vs LS:Lyme Twists:WrightWon 40
W#1 DoublesRebecca Coffey / Mary Ann Moran vs Susan Dellenbaugh / Carol Strafaci6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAmy Searle vs Michele Guo7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSusan Potter / Nancy Schumann vs Ann Wright / Paula Passarello6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesHollis Ridgway / Carolyn Caldwell vs Eleanor Shields / Denise Marvel6-0, 6-0
2020-10-18vs LS:Lyme Twists:WrightWon 30
W#1 DoublesPhilippa Mannino / Rebecca Coffey vs Sheryl Ash / Ann Wright6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSusan Potter / Hollis Ridgway vs Diane Comforti / Eleanor Shields6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSvetlana Goletz / Amy Searle vs Dawn Mastronunzio / Paula Passarello6-0, 6-2
2020-09-27vs MIS:Johnson/SteppanLost 13
L#1 DoublesBeverly Costello / Nancy Schumann vs Dana Johnson / Claire Steppan6-7, 0-6
L#1 SinglesAmy Searle vs Sky Hoyt2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMary Ann Moran / Rebecca Coffey vs Emily Hayes / Andrea Frickman2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSvetlana Goletz / Hollis Ridgway vs Courtney Marshall Corkhill / Oren Carton3-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · 3.5 Women 2
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LS:Lyme Twists:Wright000000
2OSB:Katz/Giles000000
3OSB:Prosecco Girls:Potter/Costello0823923241
4MIL:Love 'Em & Leave 'Em:Orban/Beilin0825723229
5MIS:Johnson/Steppan08191334283
6NHH:Fireballs 3.5:Gershfeld08181434270
7TC:The Ova's:Tsichlas08141841299
8MAD:3.5W Madrackets:Goldfeder0862652338
9LS:Dematteo's Diva's:Dematteo0862657368

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Crystal Cowles
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.41
Philippa Mannino
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.29
Svetlana Goletz
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Agnieszka Robinson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.21
Amy Searle
usually #1 Singles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.20
Beverly Costello
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.17
Hollis Ridgway
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.12
Mary Ann Moran
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.05
Carolyn Caldwell
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.98
Nancy Schumann
usually #3 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
2.85
Rebecca Coffey
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.67
Jane Pfeffer
published
Bonnie Roberts
published
Susan Potter
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Ann Moran + Nancy Schumann3353% games+8.5% vs expected
Beverly Costello + Carolyn Caldwell8555% games+7.1% vs expected
Beverly Costello + Philippa Mannino271852% games+5.2% vs expected
Rebecca Coffey + Philippa Mannino5849% games+5.0% vs expected
Susan Potter + Nancy Schumann9263% games+3.6% vs expected
Susan Potter + Beverly Costello14358% games+3.5% vs expected
Beverly Costello + Mary Ann Moran4254% games+2.5% vs expected
Rebecca Coffey + Mary Ann Moran61344% games+2.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Crystal Cowles
47W–30L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%75%25%
3.91
Philippa Mannino
66W–69L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%76%23%
3.41
Svetlana Goletz
49W–31L career · 5 lines in 2021
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Agnieszka Robinson
19W–14L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Amy Searle
85W–115L career · 7 lines in 2021
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Beverly Costello
82W–87L career · 7 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Hollis Ridgway
33W–20L career · 7 lines in 2021
9%90%1%
3.17
Mary Ann Moran
47W–45L career · 3 lines in 2021
17%83%<1%
3.12
3.5
Carolyn Caldwell
55W–46L career · 5 lines in 2021
34%66%<1%
3.05
Nancy Schumann
85W–93L career · 11 lines in 2021
56%44%<1%
2.98
Rebecca Coffey
59W–88L career · 9 lines in 2021
87%13%<1%
2.85
Jane Pfeffer
8W–38L career · no lines in 2021
10%90%1%
2.67
Bonnie Roberts
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Susan Potter
42W–26L career · 8 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.