Teams

OSB:Katz/Giles

2021 ECT Adult 18 & Over Women · 3.5 Women 2

13 players · average NTRP 3.36 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2020-11-22vs TC:The Ova's:TsichlasLost 13
L#1 DoublesEileen Duggan / Wendy Ford vs Tina Rivera / Jennifer Persio3-6, 5-6
L#1 SinglesMeghan Trausch vs Kyle Dawson1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesBarbara Schneider / Valerie Libert vs Carol Levarek / Jeanne Consiglio3-6, 6-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesGrace Degrooth / Cathleen Carroll vs Dale Norton / Stacey Sager0-6, 0-6
2020-11-14vs MAD:3.5W Madrackets:GoldfederLost 13
W#1 DoublesEileen Duggan / Valerie Libert vs Jennifer Brant / Meghan Farmer6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMaryBeth Giles vs Juliette Fumex1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesCarolyn Katz / Kathleen Caldarella vs Jacqui Mullally / Krista Fay1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesGrace Degrooth / Meghan Trausch vs Kathleen Imbergamo / Karen Aranow6-7, 4-6
2020-11-08vs TC:The Ova's:TsichlasSplit 22
W#1 DoublesEileen Duggan / Wendy Ford vs Tina Rivera / Dale Norton7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMaryBeth Giles vs Kyle Dawson5-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesKathleen Caldarella / Valerie Libert vs Shawna Baron / Janet Baron2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesGrace Degrooth / Carolyn Katz vs Carol Levarek / Jennifer Persio6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2020-10-17vs MAD:3.5W Madrackets:GoldfederSplit 22
W#1 DoublesEileen Duggan / Grace Degrooth vs Jacqui Mullally / Patsy Metcalf6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesMeghan Trausch vs Arlyn Davich0-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMaryBeth Giles / Heather Bancroft-Hunt vs Kathleen Speer / Jennifer Brant6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesCathleen Carroll / Valerie Libert vs Juliette Fumex / Marta Elmasry2-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · 3.5 Women 2
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LS:Lyme Twists:Wright000000
2OSB:Katz/Giles000000
3OSB:Prosecco Girls:Potter/Costello0823923241
4MIL:Love 'Em & Leave 'Em:Orban/Beilin0825723229
5MIS:Johnson/Steppan08191334283
6NHH:Fireballs 3.5:Gershfeld08181434270
7TC:The Ova's:Tsichlas08141841299
8MAD:3.5W Madrackets:Goldfeder0862652338
9LS:Dematteo's Diva's:Dematteo0862657368

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Eileen Duggan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.49
Carolyn Katz
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.44
Cathleen Carroll
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.36
Meghan Trausch
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.30
MaryBeth Giles
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.30
Grace Degrooth
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.27
Heather Bancroft-Hunt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Valerie Libert
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.04
Leslie Gourlay
published
2.82
Kathleen Caldarella
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Barbara Schneider
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Barbara Pilcher
published 3
Barbara Tanner
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meghan Trausch + Cathleen Carroll8169% games+14.4% vs expected
Eileen Duggan + MaryBeth Giles6067% games+11.7% vs expected
Valerie Libert + Heather Bancroft-Hunt2348% games+6.5% vs expected
Carolyn Katz + Grace Degrooth21961% games+6.3% vs expected
Eileen Duggan + Heather Bancroft-Hunt10267% games+6.2% vs expected
MaryBeth Giles + Carolyn Katz20760% games+2.8% vs expected
Valerie Libert + Eileen Duggan12455% games+2.3% vs expected
Cathleen Carroll + Leslie Gourlay7847% games+1.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Eileen Duggan
137W–60L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%23%77%
3.60
3.5
Carolyn Katz
87W–37L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%52%48%
3.49
3.5
Cathleen Carroll
132W–93L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%67%33%
3.44
Meghan Trausch
29W–22L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%86%14%
3.36
MaryBeth Giles
75W–40L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Grace Degrooth
67W–46L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Heather Bancroft-Hunt
48W–25L career · 1 line in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
Valerie Libert
49W–35L career · 4 lines in 2021
2%95%3%
3.26
Leslie Gourlay
46W–56L career · no lines in 2021
38%62%<1%
3.04
Kathleen Caldarella
55W–28L career · 2 lines in 2021
1%91%9%
2.82
3
Barbara Schneider
19W–26L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
3
Barbara Pilcher
26W–36L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
2.69
Barbara Tanner
13W–27L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.